【HIBISCS 5199 交流专区】木槿花石油

CUTERABBITGROUP

大红花石油私配定价20仙
财经新闻 财经  2016-01-17 11:06
http://www.nanyang.com/node/744289?tid=462

（吉隆坡16日讯）大红花石油（HIBISCS，5199，主板工业产品股）第三批私下配售，私配价定于每股20仙。

根据文告，每股20仙的私配价，相等于5天加权均价的溢价0.9%。

你的朋友

icy97 发表于 15-12-2015 01:18 AM

谢谢分享

你的朋友

CUTERABBITGROUP 发表于 18-1-2016 08:02 PM
大红花石油私配定价20仙
财经新闻
财经

谢谢分享

icy97

HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD

1. Details of Corporate Proposal
Involve issuance of new type/class of securities ?	No
Types of corporate proposal	Private Placement
Details of corporate proposal	PLACEMENT OF UP TO 326,935,484 NEW ORDINARY SHARES OF RM0.01 EACH IN HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD (HIBISCUS PETROLEUM), REPRESENTING UP TO 25% OF THE ENLARGED ISSUED AND PAID-UP ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL OF HIBISCUS PETROLEUM
No. of shares issued under this corporate proposal	19,586,000
Issue price per share ($$)	Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)   0.2000
Par Value ($$)	Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)   0.010
Latest issued and paid up share capital after the above corporate proposal in the following
Units	1,102,790,454
Currency	Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 11,027,904.540
Listing Date	21 Jan 2016

icy97

大红花暂缓向Lime索偿

财经新闻 财经  2016-01-27 11:37
（吉隆坡26日讯）大红花石油（HIBISCS，5199，主板工业产品股）澄清，独资子公司海湾大红花（Gulf Hibiscus）并没有撤回对Lime石油的索偿，而是暂缓索偿。

该公司指出，REX在昨日的公布，指海湾大红花（Gulf Hibiscus）撤回对Lime石油的索偿，且将承担所有的衍生费用。

然而，REX的宣布却省略了主要的重点，即海湾大红花在确认诉讼案所衍生的行动前，仍保留全面索偿的权力。

同时大红花石油附上庭令的原文，清楚阐明海湾大红花在最后阶段的定夺前暂缓索偿，同时反映出对于起诉Lime石油的董事充满信心。【南洋网财经】】

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("Hibiscus Petroleum" or "the Company")Further developments following the Company's clarification and related announcements of 14, 24 and 30 December 2015 and 21 January 2016
Reference is made to the Company’s clarification and related announcements on 14, 24 and 30 December 2015 and 21 January 2016 (“Earlier Announcements”).  Terms defined in the Earlier Announcements have the same meaning when used in this announcement. Reference is also made to the announcement dated 25 January 2016 made by Rex International Holding Limited (“Rex”).  In its announcement, Rex has referred to GHL withdrawing its claim for a costs indemnity from Lime Plc and GHL having to bear all costs in progressing the derivative action.  However, the Rex announcement has materially omitted reference to the fact that GHL has fully reserved its right to claim the costs of the action after determination of the derivative action.  The wording of the relevant part of the court order is reproduced below:   “The Claimant is granted leave to withdraw its application for the relief specified at paragraph 1.ii of the Application Notice without prejudice to the Applicant’s right to seek such relief after determination of the substantive claim if leave is granted to bring such claim.” Contrary to the impression which is sought to be created by the Rex announcement, it is clear from the above court order extract that the issue of costs has only been postponed (at GHL’s option) for determination at a later stage (and not abandoned by GHL).  The above position adopted by GHL reflects its confidence in the merits of the substantive claim against the Subject Directors. Further announcements will be made in due course, as may be appropriate. This announcement is dated 26 January 2016.

CUTERABBITGROUP

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("Hibiscus Petroleum" or "the Company") Further developments following the Company's clarification and related announcements of 14, 24 and 30 December 2015 and 21 and 26 January 2016
Reference is made to the Company’s clarification and related announcements on 14, 24 and 30 December 2015 and 21 and 26 January 2016 (“Earlier Announcements”).  Terms defined in the Earlier Announcements have the same meaning when used in this announcement. The Company wishes to announce that LK (Fiduciaries) Limited (“LKFL”) has issued a letter dated 3 February 2016 requesting for an urgent response from GHL and the other shareholders of Lime Petroleum Plc (“Lime Plc”, a company jointly-controlled by GHL). LKFL is a company wholly-owned and controlled by Mr Laurence Keenan (who is one of the Subject Directors of Lime Plc against whom a potential derivative action on behalf of Lime Plc has been announced and is pending) and his daughter, Ms Ashley Keenan.  LKFL is also the registered agent of Lime Plc. In its above letter to the Board of Lime Plc, LKFL has stated (among others) the following: (a)        the Subject Directors (namely Mr Karl Helge Tore Lidgren, Mr Simon Comina and Mr Laurence Keenan, against all of whom a potential derivative action on behalf of Lime Plc has been announced and is pending) intend to proceed to make decisions at a meeting to be convened today (4 February 2016) without the presence of the GHL nominated director (despite the requirements of the Shareholders’ Agreement dated 24 October 2011 entered into by Rex Middle East Ltd (“Rex”), Schroder & Co Banque S.A. (“Schroder”), GHL and Lime Plc (“Shareholders’ Agreement”), otherwise); (b)        the matters to be considered at today’s meeting include a proposal for the winding up of Lime Plc; and (c)        according to LKFL, one of the consequences of the winding up action will be the staying of the derivative action against the Subject Directors (which will be to the benefit of those individuals). As expressly confirmed by Rex International Holding Limited in its announcement dated 25 January 2016, it would be noted that each of Mr Laurence Keenan and the other two Subject Directors are all nominees of Rex and Schroder. As such, the Company notes that the matters set out in LKFL’s letter are being initiated and pursued by parties who are all conflicted and have self-serving interests in the matter.    The Company views the above as a clear attempt by the Subject Directors and their related parties to avoid liability through improper means.  GHL and its nominee director have challenged the above latest actions by LKFL and the Subject Directors. In addition, as Section 12.1 of the Shareholders’ Agreement stipulates that each shareholder of Lime Plc (including Rex and Schroder) can only nominate one (1) director each, the above position of three (3) nominees from two (2) shareholders represents a serious contravention of the Shareholders’ Agreement, and will be subject to appropriate legal and other action accordingly. The Company and its subsidiaries fully reserve all their rights and will continue to act accordingly to safeguard their interests. Further announcements will be made in due course, as may be appropriate. This announcement is dated 4 February 2016.

CUTERABBITGROUP

油價低迷‧木槿花放眼更多收購
2016-02-05 10:29
http://biz.sinchew.com.my/node/130923#ixzz3zG3QdGh8

（吉隆坡4日訊）油價低迷，木槿花石油（HIBISCS,5199,主板工業產品組）反而放眼收購更多油氣資產。

該公司主席再努在股東特大後表示，若有價格合理的優質油田，該公司會伺機收購。

隨著股東今日通過後，該公司將以5千250萬美元（約2億2千830萬令吉），向英國蜆殼石油（Shell）、蜆殼石油探測與生產岸外投資公司及和英國埃索（Esso）探測與生產公司，收購Anasuria Cluster的50%股權。

再努表示，預期在2月杪或3月時，可完成上述收購，屆時公司每天的石油產量上探3千500桶左右。

Hydra能源收購
或發新股

詢及Hydra能源收購一事時，他僅表示，該收購案仍在洽談中，不願多談。

根據文告，木槿花石油在去年11月宣佈收購澳洲Hydra能源所有股權，把公司在當地石油資產提高到2千300萬至2千500萬桶。

木槿花石油將通過發行新股，或雙方同意的其他方式，來完成這項交易。

同時，雙方也會對此進行緊密審核，並委任獨立估價師來評估Hydra能源控股股權的市值。

對於油價低迷，他說，該公司目前每桶石油生產成本約27美元左右，因此油價只要在28美元以上，那麼該公司依舊可以獲利。“目前，油價企穩30美元以上，對公司而言，這是正面的。”

他指出，雖然油價低於25美元，將會對該公司造成負面的影響，但該公司仍會繼續營運，因為油氣領域需要長期的經營。根據研究機構的預期，今年油價最高可上探40至50美元，若油價能上升至這個價格，對該公司而言，屬於利好消息。

《彭博社》早前報道，2016年年杪油價有望回揚50%。

詢及馬幣波動的衝擊，他表示，匯率波動對公司的影響不大，因為所有的營運成本及利潤都以美元計價，形成自然護盤，因此即使馬幣兌美元回揚4令吉以下，也不會造成太大的影響。（星洲日報／財經）

icy97

Type	Reply to Query
Reply to Bursa Malaysia's Query Letter - Reference ID	IQL-05022016-00001
Subject	Further developments on announcements dated 14, 24 and 30 December 2015 and 21 and 26 January 2016.
Description	Hibiscus Petroleum Berhad ("Hibiscus Petroleum" or the "Company")Further developments on announcements dated 14, 24 and 30 December 2015 and 21 and 26 January 2016.
Query Letter Contents	We refer to your Company’s announcement dated 4 February 2016, in respect of the aforesaid matter. In this connection, kindly furnish Bursa Securities with the following additional information for public release:- Composition of the board of directors of Lime Petroleum Plc (“Lime Plc”) and the appointment date; Salient terms of shareholders agreement governing Lime Plc, including but not limited to, sharing of control over its business affairs, strategic, financial and operational decisions and the respective shareholders’ rights and obligations in Lime Plc; The date when the corporate proposals/restructuring exercise undertaken by Lime Petroleum Norway AS (“LPN”) and Masirah Oil Ltd (“MOL”) was approved by Lime Plc and the completion date; Full consequences of the winding up of Lime Plc, including legal, financial and operational impact to Hibiscus; Proposed steps to be taken by Hibiscus in respect of the winding up of Lime Plc.
Further to Hibiscus Petroleum Berhad’s (or the “Company”) announcements dated 14, 24 and 30 December 2015, 21 and 26 January 2016, and 4 February 2016 (“Earlier Announcements”), and Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad’s (“Bursa Securities”) query letter dated 5 February 2016 reference number IQL-05022016-00001, we set out our responses to the same below. Terms defined in the Earlier Announcements have the same meaning when used in this announcement. 1. Composition of the board of directors of Lime Petroleum Plc (“Lime Plc”) and the appointment       date; The current board of directors of Lime Plc comprises : (i) Mr Karl Helge Tore Lidgren : Appointed on 30 January 2013 (ii) Mr Simon Comina : Appointed on 9 September 2011 (iii) Mr Laurence Keenan : Appointed on 15 August 2011 (iv) Mr Lim Kock Hooi : Appointed on or about 5  November 2015 2. Salient terms of shareholders agreement governing Lime Plc, including but not limited to, sharing of control over its business affairs, strategic, financial and operational decisions and the respective shareholders’ rights and obligations in Lime Plc; Please refer to the attachments. 3. The date when the corporate proposals/restructuring exercise undertaken by Lime Petroleum Norway AS (“LPN”) and Masirah Oil Ltd (“MOL”) was approved by Lime Plc and the completion date; The relevant corporate proposals/restructuring exercise involving LPN and MOL, as elaborated in the Company’s earlier Reply to Query dated 30 December 2015, have not been duly approved by Lime Plc and is the subject matter of likely/ongoing legal proceedings (including the current application in the Isle of Man courts for leave to bring a derivative action against the Subject Directors). In the circumstances, the Company is unable to provide any additional information at this stage. However, the Company will continue to make further announcements in a due and timely manner, when appropriate. 4. Full consequences of the winding up of Lime Plc, including legal, financial and operational impact to Hibiscus; As highlighted in its Earlier Announcements, the Hibiscus Petroleum Group has, amongst others, engaged Isle of Man, Norwegian and BVI legal counsels in relation to the matter. In view of the likely/ongoing legal proceedings arising from the matter, the Company is unable to provide any further information at this stage. The Company has made, and will continue to make, further announcements in a due and timely manner, when appropriate. 5. Proposed steps to be taken by Hibiscus in respect of the winding up of Lime Plc. As highlighted in the Company’s announcement of 4 February 2016, GHL and its nominee director have challenged the latest actions (including the proposed winding up of Lime Plc) and fully reserved their rights. Please refer to the response to Query 3 and Query 4 above. This announcement is dated 10 February 2016.

http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/4997621

Attachments Attachment.pdf Attachment B.pdf

icy97

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	Hibiscus Petroleum Berhad ("Hibiscus Petroleum" or "the Company")Further developments following the Company's clarification and related announcements of 14, 24 and 30 December 2015, 21 and 26 January 2016, and 4 and 10 February 2016
Reference is made to the Company’s clarification and related announcements on 14, 24 and 30 December 2015, 21 and 26 January 2016, and 4 and 10 February 2016 (“Earlier Announcements”).  Terms defined in the Earlier Announcements have the same meaning when used in this announcement. Reference is also made to the announcement dated 6 February 2016 made by Rex International Holding Limited (“Rex”) (“Rex Announcement”). The Company notes the following from the Rex Announcement: (a)        Rex admits that it had declared Mr Laurence Keenan as a nominee director of Rex Middle East Ltd (“Rex ME”) and Schroder; (b)        Rex claims that the above statement in its earlier announcement was “erroneously” made (notwithstanding the materiality and fundamental nature of such a statement, and notwithstanding the high disclosure standards normally expected of public listed companies, especially those with a listing sponsor); (c)        there are now two (2) vastly conflicting positions emanating from the same source, namely public announcements made by Rex, and it is uncertain (without satisfactory independent confirmation and verification) as to which statement accurately reflects the actual position; (d)        further, Rex has also gone on to state (among others) that Mr Karl Helge Tore Lidgren has been on the board of directors of Lime Plc “since its inception in 2011”, but based on the Register of Directors of Lime Plc, the date of appointment of Mr Lidgren to the board is 30 January 2013 (which is certainly not the “inception” of Lime Plc in 2011).  Yet again, there appears to be correctness and/or reliability issues with a Rex announcement. The Rex Announcement also contains (among others) the following erroneous or potentially misleading statements: (i)         There is reference in LKFL’s letter dated 3 February 2016 (“LKFL’s Letter”) to a Lime Plc board meeting/conference call to be held on 4 February 2016.  As reflected in Sections 12.3.1 and 14.3 of the Lime Plc Shareholders’ Agreement, there is a minimum notice period of at least ten (10) business days before a board meeting can be duly convened.  As such, the purported calling of a board meeting with one day’s notice is clearly in breach of the Shareholders’ Agreement and invalid. (ii)        There is reference to Mr Laurence Keenan being appointed to function as an external independent director of Lime Plc in 2011.  While this may have been the original intention, it is also clear that such a status only applies insofar as Mr Keenan continues to satisfy the definition of “External Director” under the Shareholders’ Agreement and remains independent (and does not function as a representative of any shareholder/affiliate).  Based on the contrary earlier announcement by Rex and  Rex’s subsequent reversal of its position in the Rex Announcement, as well as the conduct of Mr Keenan which forms part of the subject matter of the potential derivative action against the Subject Directors, Mr Keenan’s purported status as an independent director of Lime Plc is doubtful and far from certain. (iii)       There is reference to GHL’s nominee director being invited to attend the improperly convened board meeting on 4 February 2016 but he “chose not to attend”.  As elaborated in paragraph (i) above, the proposed meeting was invalid and not properly convened.  Despite the express objections raised by the GHL nominee (including on the timing, lack of adequate information and appropriateness of the proposed decisions), LKFL’s Letter states and highlights in red as follows: Note If Mr Lim does not attend tomorrow and fails to respond with reasons as to why the Financial Distress does not actually exist and even if he does the other Directors will continue to meet and will as mentioned proceed with any decisions on a simple majority basis. It is clear from the words “even if he does” above that the other directors will continue to make decisions on a simple majority basis even if GHL’s nominee director attended the meeting and presented very good reasons why there is no situation of financial distress affecting Lime Plc.  In short, the attendance and input of the GHL nominee director is regarded as irrelevant by LKFL and (apparently) the Subject Directors. (iv)       There is reference to there being three options listed in LKFL’s Letter.  It would be noted that the proposed winding up of Lime Plc was the first option and the one with the most extreme consequences.  Pursuant to the Listing Requirements and based on the conduct of the Subject Directors threatened in LKFL’s Letter, the Company was obliged to disclose the same. (v)        There is reference to Lime Plc being in a “financial distress situation” and further, that in such a situation, decisions can be “taken by a simple majority of the directors”.  Such a statement and conclusion is clearly incorrect.  Firstly, the possibility of Lime Plc being in “financial distress” has been raised by LKFL and the Subject Directors on the basis of what is claimed to be preliminary draft management accounts, without proper supporting evidence and verification.  Until and unless such a position has been conclusively determined and properly confirmed, it is premature and erroneous to state (as what Rex has done) that Lime Plc is in a “financial distress situation”.  In particular, there are substantial amounts which appear to be due and owing by Rex ME and/or Schroder to Lime Plc and such amounts (including the claim amount against the Subject Directors under the potential derivative action) would need to be taken into account accordingly in any review of the financial position of Lime Plc.  Secondly, the Shareholders’ Agreement provides that even in a case of “Financial Distress” (as that term is defined in the agreement) a board decision can only be taken with a simple majority if “the decision would with certainty be necessary to remedy the Financial Distress” and “it is an emergency action to avert bankruptcy”.         (vi)       There is reference to GHL’s purported failure to pay committed cash calls.  GHL disputes that there has been such failure as alleged by Rex.  Further, it is interesting that Rex makes reference to purported demands for confirmation of available funds from the Company but neglects to refer to any valid basis or ground to make such demands, particularly when such “demands” (if true) appear to have been directed solely at one party in a discriminatory and self-serving fashion. (vii)      There is reference to the issue of confidentiality under the Shareholders’ Agreement.  What Rex has failed to state is that any applicable confidentiality obligations under the Shareholders’ Agreement are also expressly subject to (among others) disclosures required by the rules of any competent regulatory body (such as Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad). (viii)     There is reference to the leave application to bring a derivative action in the name of and on behalf of Lime Plc as “being resisted”.  Again, such a statement is incorrect as Lime Plc has yet to confirm its position vis-à-vis the leave application.  In view of the severely conflicted position of the Subject Directors and LKFL, it would be appreciated that even the proper instructing/representative party on behalf of Lime Plc in the matter has yet to be satisfactorily determined.          In addition, Rex has made a number of allegations and claims in the Rex Announcement which relate to or otherwise affect the Company and/or its subsidiaries, and these will be subject to appropriate legal and other action by the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company and its subsidiaries fully reserve all their rights and will continue to act accordingly to safeguard their interests.    Further announcements will be made in due course, as may be appropriate. This announcement is dated 12 February 2016.

icy97

icy97 发表于 7-8-2015 03:10 AM
大红花石油斥近2亿　购英油田区50%股权

二零一五年八月七日 晚上八时三十八分

大红花石油购英国油田获准

财经新闻 财经  2016-02-17 12:45
（吉隆坡16日讯）大红花石油（HIBISCS，5199，主板工业产品股）持股50%的子公司ANASURIA大红花，收购ANASURIA油田的交易，已获英国政府放行。

根据文告，英国能源与气候变化部已在上周二（9日）和上周四（11日），分别针对ANASURIA油田内的各个油田，发出相关批准。

该部门批准了英国蚬壳、蚬壳EP岸外与英国埃索（Esso）勘探和生产公司，将该油田的股权转让给ANASURIA大红花和Ping石油。

同时，该部门也准许ANASURIA营运公司和英国Ithaca能源公司，受委为ANASURIA油田内小油田的营运业者。

不过，各方必须符合英国能源与气候变化部的相关条件，交易才能获得同意与批准。

这些条件包括，股权转让必须以该部门认同的方式进行，还有，公司必须在今年5月9日和11日，完成收购。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	TRANSACTIONS (CHAPTER 10 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) NON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("HIBISCUS PETROLEUM" OR THE "COMPANY")PROPOSED ACQUISITION BY ANASURIA HIBISCUS UK LIMITED, AN INDIRECT WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF HIBISCUS PETROLEUM, OF A 50% INTEREST IN THE ANASURIA CLUSTER FROM SHELL U.K. LIMITED, SHELL EP OFFSHORE VENTURES LIMITED AND ESSO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION UK LIMITED FOR A TOTAL CASH CONSIDERATION OF US$52.5 MILLION ("PROPOSED ACQUISITION")
We refer to the announcements dated 6 August 2015 and 4 February 2016 in relation to the Proposed Acquisition. On behalf of the Board of Directors of Hibiscus Petroleum, CIMB Investment Bank Berhad wishes to announce that the Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change of the United Kingdom Government (“Secretary of State”) has, vide its notices dated 9 February 2016 (in respect of the Guillemot A Field, the Teal Field and the Teal South Field) and 11 February 2016 (in respect of the Cook Field) (which were both received on 12 February 2016) granted its consents and approvals in relation to the Proposed Acquisition for the following: (i)         the assignment of the relevant interests of Shell U.K. Limited, Shell EP Offshore Ventures Limited and Esso Exploration and Production UK Limited under the relevant licences of the Anasuria Cluster to Anasuria Hibiscus UK Limited and Ping Petroleum UK Limited; (ii)         the creation and execution of (and the transactions contained in) the relevant assignment documents including the assignment of the entitlement to the benefit of rights granted by the licenses and transfer of operatorships; (iii)        the appointment of Anasuria Operating Company Limited as the operator of the Guillemot A Field, the Teal Field and the Teal South Field; and (iv)        the appointment of Ithaca Energy (UK) Limited as the operator of the Cook Field. The Secretary of State’s consents and approvals are subject to the following conditions: (a)        the deeds of assignment being executed in a form approved by the Secretary of State; (b)        the Proposed Acquisition being completed during the period of validity of the consents and approvals of the Secretary of State which is until 9 May 2016 (in respect of the Guillemot A Field, the Teal Field and the Teal South Field) and 11 May 2016 (in respect of the Cook Field); and (c)        the Department of Energy and Climate Change to be notified of the completion of the Proposed Acquisition within 2 weeks of completion. This announcement is dated 15 February 2016.

icy97

SUMMARY OF KEY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 31 Dec 2015

		INDIVIDUAL PERIOD		CUMULATIVE PERIOD
		CURRENT YEAR QUARTER	PRECEDING YEAR CORRESPONDING QUARTER	CURRENT YEAR TO DATE	PRECEDING YEAR CORRESPONDING PERIOD
		31 Dec 2015	31 Dec 2014	31 Dec 2015	31 Dec 2014
		$$'000	$$'000	$$'000	$$'000

1	Revenue	955	2,379	1,200	4,550
2	Profit/(loss) before tax	-164,157	-10,634	-159,398	-20,600
3	Profit/(loss) for the period	-164,166	-10,658	-159,417	-19,935
4	Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent	-164,166	-10,658	-159,417	-19,935
5	Basic earnings/(loss) per share (Subunit)	-16.32	-1.20	-16.18	-2.87
6	Proposed/Declared dividend per share (Subunit)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
		AS AT END OF CURRENT QUARTER		AS AT PRECEDING FINANCIAL YEAR END
7	Net assets per share attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent ($$)	0.4300		0.5500

icy97

看好第3季能够转盈 大红花石油不可小觑

经济新闻
29/03/201619:13
（吉隆坡29日讯）随着收购Anasuria油气田50％后，本地石油和天然气勘探与生产商大红花石油有限公司（HIBISCS，5199，工业产品组），看好在2016财政年第3季度能够转盈。

该集团董事经理肯尼思佩雷拉博士说，上述交易有望能够在近期内完成，而准备资产转让的运作正在进行中。

“该交易具有里程碑意义，因它可以在目前的油价中，将使我们能够转而成为一家可赚取盈利的实体。”

“大红花石油在Anasuria油气田拥有总值5200万美元的权益，该油气田自1996年起已开始生产，从目前起还有16至20年的经济产量。”

他在媒体发布会上向记者透露：“3个月后，我们将会证明上述资产的价值。我们还在等待有关当局的批准，转让其中一个产权的许可证。”

Anasuria油气田位于苏格兰东部岸外的英国北海领海内。


在截至2015年12月31日止第2季度，该公司录得的税前亏损按年从1060万令吉恶化至1亿6420万令吉。

在总值1亿6240万令吉的税前亏损中，8450万令吉是属于澳洲巴斯海峡VIC/P57勘探许可证的局部账面价值损失。

“鉴于过去3个月油价下跌，以及我们在2015年11月11日发布公告称，我们已经完成了海狮-1钻井的探勘，并没有在该井发现任何碳氢化合物，因此我们对VIC/P57许可证的账面价值进行减值的评估。”

佩雷拉指出：“我们希望油价将在未来会转强，这使我们能够从上述账户中回拔一些资金。”

他补充：“至于另外的5600万令吉亏损，归因于石灰石油在挪威石灰石油，以及石灰石油在马斯来石油有限公司的权益遭到稀释。”【光华日报财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	Press Release - Hibiscus Petroleum Reports First Half Results With Anasuria Transaction On Track For Completion
We attach herewith our press release dated 29 February 2016 entitled “Hibiscus Petroleum Reports First Half Results With Anasuria Transaction On Track For Completion". This announcement is dated 29 February 2016.

http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/5015901

Attachments FINAL 2016 02 29 Press Release - QR.pdf

icy97

大红花石油完成收购Chluster经营权

财经  2016年03月10日
（吉隆坡10日讯）隨著呈交买卖协议中所需的文件，大红花石油（HIBISCS，5199，主板工业股）宣布，该公司间接独资子公司——Anasuria Hibiscus有限公司已符合所收购Anasuria Chluster公司的经营权的条件，並完成收购。

Anasuria Hibiscus有限公司在去年8月初协同英国Ping石油公司，以1亿零500万美元（约4亿3183万令吉）向英国蜆壳有限公司、蜆壳开採及生產离岸投资有限公司和英国埃索开採及生產有限公司，收购Anasuria Cluster公司的经营权。

Anasuria Hibiscus有限公司和Ping石油公司，將持有所收购资產的50%。大红花石油在这项收购行动只需支付5250万美元。【东方网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	TRANSACTIONS (CHAPTER 10 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) NON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("HIBISCUS PETROLEUM" OR "COMPANY")EXECUTION OF A BINDING EQUITY TRANSACTION TERM SHEET IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF 100% EQUITY INTEREST IN HYDRA ENERGY HOLDINGS PTY LTD ("HEH") TO BE SATISFIED THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF NEW ORDINARY SHARES OF RM0.01 EACH IN HIBISCUS PETROLEUM ("HIBISCUS PETROLEUM SHARES") ("PROPOSED ACQUISITION")
We refer to the announcements dated 9 November 2015 and 13 November 2015 in relation to the Proposed Acquisition (“Announcements”). Unless otherwise stated, the abbreviations and definitions used in this announcement shall have the same meaning as defined in the Announcements. On behalf of the Company, Affin Hwang IB wishes to announce that it has come to Hibiscus Petroleum’s attention that The Western Australia online newspaper has on 10 March 2016 published an article entitled “Hydra collapse frees up permits” (“Article”) which relates to Hydra Energy (WA) Pty Ltd’s (“HE (WA)”) purported insolvency position. The Company is seeking clarification from HEH in relation to the contents of the Article. HE (WA) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of HEH. Pursuant to the above, the Company is seeking clarification from HEH in relation to the contents of the Article. The status of the Proposed Acquisition has remained unchanged as set out in the earlier disclosure in the unaudited quarterly financial report for the financial period ended 31 December 2015 of the Hibiscus Petroleum Group (which was published on 29 February 2016): (a)        the Proposed Acquisition is supported by the Term Sheet dated 9 November 2015; (b)        due diligence and independent probabilistic resource assessment of HEH’s assets were initiated by the Company subsequent to the execution of the Term Sheet; and (c)        the Company is awaiting HEH to revert on their position and intentions on the Proposed Acquisition. At this juncture, the Company is seeking clarification from HEH on the contents of the Article as well as HEH’s position and intentions on the Proposed Acquisition. Further announcements on the Proposed Acquisition will be made in due course, as appropriate.    This announcement is dated 10 March 2016.

icy97

大红花委Petrofac经营Anasuria设备

财经  2016年03月11日
（吉隆坡11日讯）大红花石油（HIBISCS，5199，主板工业股）宣布，子公司--Anasuria Hibiscus有限公司已完成向英国蜆壳和英国埃索勘探与生產等公司，收购Anasuria Cluster的经营权，並颁发5年合约予Petrofac设施管理公司，负责FPSO的营运及维修。

该公司发文告指出，大红花石油与英国Ping石油公司各持有Anasuria Cluster公司所收购资產的50%，后者主要在英国北海，生產石油和天然气。

文告指出，该公司为了管理上述资產，与Ping石油公司在英国成立一家联营企业，称为Anasuria Operating公司，各持有50%股权。

同时，为了支持Anasuria Operating公司履行其业务职责，在伦敦交易所上市的Petrofac公司，一家在油气领域和加工业领先国际的服务供应商，受委任为任务执行者，以监督监测和管理设施管道和海底油井。上述委任合约，为期5年。【东方网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	TRANSACTIONS (CHAPTER 10 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) NON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("HIBISCUS PETROLEUM" OR THE "COMPANY")PROPOSED ACQUISITION BY ANASURIA HIBISCUS UK LIMITED ("ANASURIA HIBISCUS"), AN INDIRECT WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF HIBISCUS PETROLEUM, OF A 50% INTEREST IN THE ANASURIA CLUSTER FROM SHELL U.K. LIMITED ("SHELL UK"), SHELL EP OFFSHORE VENTURES LIMITED ("SHELL EP") AND ESSO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION UK LIMITED ("ESSO UK") ("PROPOSED ACQUISITION")
We refer to the announcements dated 6 August 2015, 4 February 2016 and 15 February 2016 in relation to the Proposed Acquisition. On behalf of the Board of Directors of Hibiscus Petroleum, CIMB Investment Bank Berhad wishes to announce that the following conditions precedent to the conditional sale and purchase agreement entered into on 6 August 2015 between Anasuria Hibiscus, Ping Petroleum UK Limited (“Ping Petroleum”) and Shell UK and Shell EP (“Shell SPA”) and the conditional sale and purchase agreement entered into on 6 August 2015 between Anasuria Hibiscus, Ping Petroleum and Esso UK (collectively referred to as “SPAs”) have been fulfilled: (i) receipt of all necessary written consents, approvals or waivers, including the waiver or non-exercise by relevant third parties of any pre-emption rights by the relevant third parties in relation to the transfer by Shell UK, Shell EP and Esso UK to Anasuria Hibiscus and Ping Petroleum; and (ii) all operational readiness indicators under the transfer of operatorship agreement entered into on 6 August 2015 between Shell UK, Anasuria Hibiscus, Ping Petroleum and Anasuria Operating Company Limited (“AOCL”), for the transfer of operatorship of the Anasuria Cluster (save for the Cook Field) from Shell UK to AOCL have been satisfied (in relation to the Shell SPA). Following the above, all the conditions precedent to the SPAs have been met and the SPAs have become unconditional. Further, Anasuria Hibiscus, Ping Petroleum, Shell EP, Shell UK and Esso UK have agreed to bring forward the completion of the SPAs to 10 March 2016. A further announcement will be made upon completion of the Proposed Acquisition. This announcement is dated 10 March 2016.

Type	Announcement
Subject	TRANSACTIONS (CHAPTER 10 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) NON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("HIBISCUS PETROLEUM" OR THE "COMPANY")PROPOSED ACQUISITION BY ANASURIA HIBISCUS UK LIMITED ("ANASURIA HIBISCUS"), AN INDIRECT WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF HIBISCUS PETROLEUM, OF A 50% INTEREST IN THE ANASURIA CLUSTER FROM SHELL U.K. LIMITED, SHELL EP OFFSHORE VENTURES LIMITED AND ESSO EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION UK LIMITED ("PROPOSED ACQUISITION")
We refer to the announcements dated 6 August 2015, 4 February 2016, 15 February 2016 and 10 March 2016 in relation to the Proposed Acquisition. On behalf of the Board of Directors of Hibiscus Petroleum, CIMB Investment Bank Berhad wishes to announce that the Proposed Acquisition was completed on 10 March 2016. On the same day, Anasuria Operating Company Limited, a company jointly incorporated by Anasuria Hibiscus and Ping Petroleum UK Limited assumed operatorship of the Anasuria Cluster (with the exception of the Cook Field). This announcement is dated 11 March 2016.

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	Press Release - Completion of Anasuria Transaction
We attach herewith our press release dated 11 March 2016 entitled “Completion of Anasuria Transaction". This announcement is dated 11 March 2016.

http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/5027641

Attachments Hibiscus -Anasuria Press Release Final_11 March 2016.pdf

完成收购Anasuria油气田50％ 大红花石油更具实力

经济新闻
2/04/201618:50
（吉隆坡2日讯）大红花石油有限公司（HIBISCS，5199，工业产品组）间接全资子公司，Anasuria大红花（英国）有限公司，已经完成收购Anasuria油气生产区的50％权益。

该油气生产商致函大马交易所说，因此Anasuria大红花现与Ping石油有限公司，通过在英国注册成立一家名叫Anasuria营运有限公司的合资公司，共同经营上述位于北海中部的油气资产。

它称：“双方在Anasuria营运的持股比例皆是50%，而后者成为Anasuria油气生产区的持牌营运商。”

Petrofac设施管理有限公司已获委任为责任承担者，在5年的合约期限内，为Anasuria浮式生产储卸油（FPSO）设施进行操作和维修等工作。

大红花石油补充：“此外，Petrofac也负责监控和管理管道以及除了库克油田外的海底油井。”

去年8月6日，大红花石油与蚬壳英国有限公司、蚬壳EP岸外投资有限公司，以及埃索勘探和生产（英国）有限公司签署一份买卖协议，收购Anasuria油气生产区的权益。

大红花石油主席再努拉欣莫哈末扎因指出，该油气生产区拥有4个油气田，以及重要的基础设施包括Anasuria浮式生产储卸油设施。

目前，大红花石油的每日生产量是超过4000桶。

他补充：“能够成为上述北海岸外资产的拥有者及共同营运商一事，对于大红花石油来说是具有里程碑意义。”

该油气生产商在经营其资产时，也非常注重工业安全、环保和获利潜质。

大红花石油新企业和生产部副总裁兼Anasuria营运生产部董事马克佩顿表示：“集团有信心任命Petrofac提供5年服务，主要是凭着双方之间的关系和它的职业道德所驱使。”【光华日报财经】

icy97

Type	Announcement
Subject	NEW ISSUE OF SECURITIES (CHAPTER 6 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) OTHER ISSUE OF SECURITIES
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("HIBISCUS PETROLEUM" OR "COMPANY")PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF AMOUNT OWING TO PING PETROLEUM LIMITED ("PING") VIA ISSUANCE OF UP TO 4.88% OF THE ISSUED AND PAID-UP SHARE CAPITAL OF HIBISCUS PETROLEUM ("PROPOSED SETTLEMENT")
On behalf of the Board of Directors of Hibiscus Petroleum, Affin Hwang Investment Bank Berhad wishes to announce that Hibiscus Petroleum proposes to undertake a settlement of amount owing to Ping via issuance of up to 53,848,537 new ordinary shares of RM0.01 each in the Company, representing up to 4.88% of the issued and paid-up share capital of the Company in relation to the Introducer Fee (as defined in Section 2.1 of the attachment). Please refer to the attachment for further details. This announcement is dated 14 March 2016.

http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/5030173

Attachments Project Bunga Raya2-Proposed Settlement (Final)(clean).pdf

icy97

大红花石油购Hydra能源不变

财经新闻 财经  2016-03-19 14:24
（吉隆坡18日讯）尽管有媒体报道澳洲Hydra能源控股公司的核心业务面对破产，大红花石油（HIBISCS，5199，主板工业产品股）称对该公司的收购计划仍不变。

大红花石油董事经理肯尼思佩雷拉向《The Edge》透露，公司已向对方查证该项报道是否属实，然而目前还未得回应。

据澳洲媒体《西澳洲人》报道，Hydra能源的独资公司Hydra能源有限公司面对资金问题，该公司董事曾向两家破产事务所Pitcher Partners’Bryan Hughes 以及Daniel Bredenkamp寻求援助。

哪怕Hydra能源真的犹如媒体报道所称，佩雷拉认为，这不意味着Hydra能源的资产在商业上不可行，或是低质量。

“公司收购Hydra能源的理由，就是为了在澳洲能够拥有更多产量，由此我们可以将当地的每桶生产成本降至合理水平。”

佩雷拉补充，收购内容不会再作出任何更动，目前整个收购课题主要在于收购价。

“如果价格好，对方提供一个合理的价位，那我们就会继续进行收购。”【南洋网财经】

icy97

Type	Announcement
Subject	NEW ISSUE OF SECURITIES (CHAPTER 6 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) FUND RAISING
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("HIBISCUS PETROLEUM" OR THE "COMPANY")PLACEMENT OF UP TO 326,935,484 NEW ORDINARY SHARES OF RM0.01 EACH IN HIBISCUS PETROLEUM ("PLACEMENT SHARES"), REPRESENTING UP TO 25% OF THE ENLARGED ISSUED AND PAID-UP ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL OF THE COMPANY ("PLACEMENT")
(Unless otherwise stated, all definitions and terms used in this announcement shall have the same meaning as defined in the announcement dated 11 September 2015.) Reference is made to the announcements dated 11 September 2015, 14 September 2015, 23 September 2015, 28 September 2015, 13 October 2015, 1 December 2015, 4 December 2015, 7 December 2015, 11 December 2015, 18 December 2015, 21 December 2015, 14 January 2016, 20 January 2016, 21 January 2016 and 15 March 2016 in relation to the Placement. On behalf of Hibiscus Petroleum, we wish to announce that the Company had on 21 March 2016 (“Price Fixing Date”) fixed the issue price of the Placement Shares for the fourth tranche of the Placement at RM0.200 per Placement Share (“Issue Price”). The Issue Price represents a discount of approximately 11.1% to the 5-day volume weighted average market price of Hibiscus Petroleum Shares up to and including 18 March 2016, being the market day immediately prior to the Price Fixing Date, of RM0.225. This announcement is dated 21 March 2016.

icy97

HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD

1. Details of Corporate Proposal
Involve issuance of new type/class of securities ?	No
Types of corporate proposal	Private Placement
Details of corporate proposal	PLACEMENT OF UP TO 326,935,484 NEW ORDINARY SHARES OF RM0.01 EACH IN HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD (HIBISCUS PETROLEUM), REPRESENTING UP TO 25% OF THE ENLARGED ISSUED AND PAID-UP ORDINARY SHARE CAPITAL OF HIBISCUS PETROLEUM
No. of shares issued under this corporate proposal	30,000,000
Issue price per share ($$)	Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)   0.2000
Par Value ($$)	Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)   0.010
Latest issued and paid up share capital after the above corporate proposal in the following
Units	1,132,790,454
Currency	Malaysian Ringgit (MYR) 11,327,904.540
Listing Date	29 Mar 2016

icy97

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("Hibiscus Petroleum" or "the Company") Further developments following the Company's clarification and related announcements of 14, 24 and 30 December 2015, 21 and 26 January 2016, 4, 10 and 12 February 2016, and 4 March 2016
Reference is made to the Company’s clarification and related announcements on 14, 24 and 30 December 2015, 21 and 26 January 2016, 4, 10 and 12 February 2016, and 4 March 2016 (“Earlier Announcements”).  Terms defined in the Earlier Announcements have the same meaning when used in this announcement. The Company wishes to inform as follows: 1.         On 28 March 2016 (BVI time), the BVI lawyers acting for Mr Pascal Hos (the Lime Petroleum Limited  (“Lime BVI”) nominee director representing the interests of GHL on the board of Dahan Petroleum Limited (“Dahan”), an indirect subsidiary of Lime Plc) (“PH”) sent a letter to the board of directors of Dahan to record PH’s objections to a liquidation proposal for Dahan as formulated by Mr Simon Comina (one of the Subject Directors against whom the proposed Isle of Man derivative action is pending and also a representative director of Schroder on the board of Dahan) (“Legal Notice”). 2.         In the Legal Notice, PH highlighted that the liquidation proposal (which included a proposed sale of Schroder’s shareholding in Dahan to Rex; the proposed execution by Dahan of a termination agreement relating to the RAK North Offshore Concession  (Saleh Area); and the proposed passing of resolutions to initiate and implement a liquidation of Dahan – all the components of which were dependent and/or inter-conditional on one another) (“Dahan Liquidation Proposal”) should be subjected to proper and careful consideration, including the obtaining of appropriate legal, financial and other advice by Dahan so that there is a proper basis for the directors to make an informed decision on the proposal. The Legal Notice noted that despite PH’s request for the relevant information and the repeated highlighting of his concerns, Mr Comina and the other Dahan director (Mr Yaw Chee Siew, the representative director of Right Ally Limited (“Right Ally”), the other shareholder of Dahan) appeared intent to push through the liquidation proposal without the requisite supra majority approval provided under the shareholders agreement entered into by Dahan and its shareholders (namely Lime BVI, Schroder and Right Ally) (“Dahan SHA”), such supra majority approval of which must include the approval of PH as the Lime BVI nominee director. 3.         The Legal Notice went on to request for an undertaking from the other board members of Dahan that no board meeting will take place on 30 March 2016 or any other date for the purpose of purporting to pass any resolution to put into effect any component of the Dahan Liquidation Proposal.  The Legal Notice highlighted PH’s right to file for interim injunctive relief through the BVI courts if the requested undertaking was not provided within the stipulated timeframe.            4.         After expiry of the specified timeframe for provision of the above undertaking and in order to address the impending date of the potential board meeting on or before 30 March 2016, PH’s BVI lawyers filed an application to the BVI courts on 29 March 2016 to apply for interim injunctive relief to ensure that Dahan, whether through its directors or otherwise, would not act in contravention of the Dahan SHA (particularly the supra majority requirement for board reserved matters) or the Business Companies Act 2004 and Dahan’s memorandum and articles of association. 5.         Reference was also made in the filed court application to an undertaking letter dated 9 January 2012 issued by Lime BVI to GHL (“Lime BVI Undertaking”).  The Lime BVI Undertaking confirms that Lime BVI agrees and undertakes to procure that its nominee director on the board of Dahan will not give any approval for purposes of the supra majority requirement under the Dahan SHA unless GHL’s representative director on the board of Dahan gives approval for such supra majority approval.  The effect of the Lime BVI Undertaking is that GHL controls the exercise of the supra majority approval by Lime BVI. 6.         Subsequent to the filing of the injunctive court application by PH’s BVI lawyers, an undertaking was provided by Dahan (through its lawyers) on 29 March 2016 that Dahan will not pass any resolution in contravention of the Dahan SHA (“Dahan Undertaking”). 7.         However, on 30 March 2016, Dahan purportedly passed a shareholders’ resolution to remove PH as a director of Dahan with immediate effect.  PH was purportedly replaced as a Dahan director by Mr Per Lind, who is also the CFO of Rex. No advance notice of such a meeting or resolution had been provided, and the agenda had neither been proposed to nor approved by the board of directors of Dahan (of which PH was a member).  Among others, GHL views the execution of the above shareholders’ resolution by only two signatories of Lime BVI as being invalid and/or defective.  This is elaborated in the following paragraph. 8.         On 30 March 2016, a Lime BVI board meeting was also held.  It would be noted that Lime BVI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Lime Plc and the directors of Lime BVI are Mr Comina, Mr Karl Lidgren (who is also another of the Subject Directors against whom the proposed Isle of Man derivative action is pending) and Dr Kenneth Pereira (as the representative director of GHL).   A resolution to purportedly ratify the change of the signature rights of the Lime BVI board (from three directors’ approval to any two directors) was proposed by Mr Comina and voted upon.  Only Mr Comina and Mr Lidgren voted in favour while Dr Pereira voted against the proposed resolution.  It is clear that to change the existing authorisation basis from three directors to two directors, such a change had to be approved under the prevailing authorisation basis – namely by all three directors – and such requisite approval was not obtained in view of Dr Pereira’s vote against such a change.            9.         In addition to the above invalidity and/or defect at Lime BVI level, it would also be noted that the purported removal of PH also contravenes Section 12.1.4 of the Lime Plc Shareholders’ Agreement (which provides that GHL has the right to a representative director on the board of Dahan and all other subsidiaries, associate companies and concession holders in which Lime Plc holds any form of interest).  Further, the removal also goes against the Lime BVI Undertaking as the right for GHL to have a representative director in Dahan is expressly acknowledged in the Lime BVI Undertaking. 10.       The representative director of GHL on the board of Baqal Petroleum Limited (another wholly owned subsidiary of Lime BVI) (“Baqal”), Mr Devarajan a/l Indran, was also purportedly removed on 30 March 2016 (and replaced by Mr Per Lind) via a purported shareholders’ resolution signed by only two representatives of Lime BVI.  It would appear that his improper removal is to enable similar liquidation and related plans to be implemented at Baqal’s level as well.  Again, it is clear that the purported resolution signed by only two representatives of Lime BVI is invalid and/or defective on the same basis as elaborated above.       11.       To protect the interests of GHL and PH, the BVI lawyers acting for GHL and PH have (among others) written: (a)        to the registered agent of Dahan (which is Icaza Gonzalez-Ruiz & Aleman (BVI) Trust Ltd) on 30 March 2016 to put the registered agent on notice as to the improper conduct and actions relating to the above and to seek a confirmation from them that no liquidation documents have been or will be filed at the BVI Corporate Registry; (b)        to Dahan’s lawyers on 31 March 2016 to highlight the breach by Dahan of its Dahan Undertaking, to challenge the validity of PH’s removal as a director of Dahan (including the purported appointment of Mr Lind) and to put them on notice with regard to various potential liabilities/implications involved (among others);    (c)        to Lime BVI (including Mr Comina and Mr Lidgren) on 31 March 2016 in relation to the breach by Lime BVI of its Lime BVI Undertaking and other improper actions elaborated above and demanding that Lime BVI remedy its breach accordingly.  Among others, Lime BVI, Mr Comina and Mr Lidgren have also been put on notice that they will be held fully liable for all consequences and implications suffered by GHL arising from the improper actions. The Company and its subsidiaries fully reserve all their rights and will continue to act accordingly to safeguard their interests.    Further announcements will be made in due course, as may be appropriate. This announcement is dated 31 March 2016.

icy97

Lime 石油挪威重组导致损失 大红花石油索偿1.36亿

财经新闻 财经  2016-04-05 10:15
（吉隆坡4日讯）大红花石油（HIBISCS，5199，主板工业产品股）宣布，子公司海湾大红花（Gulf Hibiscus）上周五已在奥斯陆调节会员会提出申诉，向Lime石油挪威的董事与总经理索偿至少3500万美元（约1亿3608万令吉）。

根据文告，该公司索偿原因是Lime石油挪威展开的重组计划，导致海湾大红花蒙受财务损失。

大红花石油表示，上述申诉是在挪威公司法令第17-1条文的范围内。

被告Lime石油挪威董事汉斯（Hans Ove Leonard Lidgren）和司文（Svein Helge Kjellesvik），以及总经理艾华（Ivar Aarseth），均是导致海湾大红花蒙受损失的主要肇事者。

这是因为，被告并没有履行作为董事及总经理的义务，特别是在Lime石油挪威的重组计划下，导致Lime公司在Lime石油挪威持股率被稀释。

大红花石油2012年时，以5500万美元（约2亿2790万令吉）收购Lime公司的35%股权，并通过海湾大红花持有该批股权。

大红花石油称，将与子公司全面保留自身的权利，且会继续采取相应行动，来捍卫自身的权益。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HIBISCUS PETROLEUM BERHAD ("Hibiscus Petroleum" or "the Company") Further developments following the Company's clarification and related announcements of 14, 24 and 30 December 2015, 21 and 26 January 2016, 4, 10 and 12 February 2016, 4 and 31 March 2016
Reference is made to the Company’s clarification and related announcements on 14, 24 and 30 December 2015, 21 and 26 January 2016, 4, 10 and 12 February 2016, and 4 and 31 March 2016 (“Earlier Announcements”).  Terms defined in the Earlier Announcements have the same meaning when used in this announcement. The Company wishes to announce that its wholly-owned subsidiary, Gulf Hibiscus Limited (“GHL”), has filed a Complaint at the Oslo Conciliation Board on 1 April 2016 to claim for compensation against the following directors and general manager of Lime Petroleum Norway AS (“Lime Norway”) for financial losses suffered by GHL in connection with the restructuring undertaken by Lime Norway (as elaborated in the Earlier Announcements). Further details of the claim are set out below: 1. Complainant : GHL 2. Defendants : Mr Hans Ove Leonard Lidgren Mr Svein Helge Kjellesvik (“Lime Norway Directors”) Mr Ivar Aarseth (“Lime Norway General Manager”) 3. Nature : Claim for compensation against the Directors and General Manager of Lime Norway 4. Estimated Value for the Claim : USD35 million and above The above complaint against the Lime Norway Directors and Lime Norway General Manager falls within the scope of the Norwegian Companies Act, Section 17-1 as those individuals are among the primary perpetrators who contributed to the damages suffered by GHL as a result of the Defendants’ failure to fulfil their general duty as directors and general manager of Lime Norway, particularly with regard to their conduct in relation to the actions taken to effect a substantial dilution of Lime Plc’s shareholding interest in Lime Norway under the restructuring undertaken by Lime Norway. The Company and its subsidiaries fully reserve all their rights and will continue to act accordingly to safeguard their interests.    Further announcements will be made in due course, as may be appropriate. This announcement is dated 4 April 2016.