【ANZO 9342 交流专区】（前名 HARVEST）

icy97

大股东被拒董事部门外 丰升工业爆发诉讼案

财经新闻 财经  2014-06-12 11:27
（吉隆坡11日讯）近期活跃于马股的东马企业家拿督蔡文杰，声称持有丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）33%股权，要求加入董事部，然而，拿督曾文秀方面则以触犯上市条例为由将之拒于门外，法律诉讼案或将爆发。

这不仅仅是蔡文杰与曾文秀的战争，曾红极一时的FTEC资源前董事经理温有能，据称属于蔡文杰的阵线，他在丰升工业毫不知情的情况下，持有10%股权。

要马交所证监会调查

蔡文杰在上月12日发信函予丰升工业，提议在本月20日的股东大会上，寻求股东批准他、黄桂华和拿督斯里阿都阿京加入董事部。

不过，丰升工业在多次召开董事部会议后，决定拒绝将之纳入股东大会的议案内。

也因如此，蔡文杰方的Messrs.Lim Chong Phang&Amy，以及Zenith City投资有限公司，在10日发出原告诉状予丰升工业。

丰升工业表示，蔡文杰等人的做法已经触犯上市条例，并向大马交易所和证监会投诉，要求介入调查。

这是因为，曾文秀曾与蔡文杰在5月9日会面，后者称与Zenith等方，共持有约33至34%的股权，并有意将手上的产业发展项目注入公司，惟未提供任何细节。

温有能未公布持股10%

此外，曾遭证监会提控盗用公款而淡出企业界的温有能，据说在丰升工业持股超过10%，且与蔡文杰同一阵线。

但丰升工业指出，温有能过去未有通知持股超过10%，可能算违例。

丰升称，再者，虽持股超过33%，但蔡文杰却有意绕过强制全面献购（MGO）这一步骤，不符合上市条例，因此决定拒绝蔡文杰的入部议案。

蔡文杰是东马木材大亨丹斯里蔡景康长子，今年入主阿斯特拉（ASUPREM，7070，主板工业产品股）和XOX说电讯（XOX，0165，创业板）。【南洋网财经】

icy97

温有能否认持股 传蔡文杰收购丰升

财经新闻 财经  2014-06-13 11:27
（吉隆坡12日讯）被拒于丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）董事部门外的拿督蔡文杰，据传有意收购公司，但被他称为“同一阵线”的温有能，则出面表示自己遭无辜牵扯，将采取法律行动。

《商业时报》引述不具名消息报道，蔡文杰有意再增持股权，计划收购丰升工业。

他目前持有19.55%股权。

“这并非恶意收购，蔡文杰视丰升工业为好的投资工具，看好增长潜能。”

蔡文杰日前声称持有33%股权，并获得持有10%股权的温有能支持，欲与另外2人加入董事部，却遭拿督曾文秀方面以触犯上市条例为由，不愿意将议案呈上股东大会。

丰升工业表示，温有能持有10%股权却未通报马交所，而蔡文杰声称持有33%股权，却有意绕开强制全面收购（MGO），不符条例。

寻法律咨询

对此，温有能接受《The Edge》访问时指出，他未持有丰升工业任何股权，不明白为何蔡文杰会“拖他下水”。

虽然他与蔡文杰和曾文秀相识，但从未与他们有生意上来往，直到看到报纸才知道此事。

“作为一家上市公司的董事经理，他应该知道股东名单……他怎么可以毫无根据地发言，我不明白。”

他已寻求法律咨询，若有必要将采取行动，同时也正准备信函，向马交所解释自己未持有股权。【南洋网财经】

icy97

发布具诽谤性不实内容 蔡文杰拟诉丰升及董事部

财经新闻 财经  2014-06-17 08:56
（八打灵再也16日讯）拿督蔡文杰澄清，丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）上周发布的文告带有不实与诽谤内容，会尽快起诉该公司和董事部诽谤。

蔡文杰指出，拿督曾文秀为首的丰升工业董事部，称他持有超过33%股权、温有能持股超过10%、欲绕道强制全购的说法，皆不属实。

他今日在律师陪同下，召开记者会，指丰升工业的文告不实、带有诽谤与恶意，是董事部设计来诋毁和伤害他，以及拒绝Zenith City投资的股东权益。

“这些不实的文告内容，败坏我的名声。已指示律师开始对有关各方采取法律行动，并可能索偿1亿令吉。”

根据丰升工业上周二发布的文告，董事经理兼总执行长曾文秀曾与蔡文杰在5月9日会面，后者称与Zenith等方，共持有约33至34%的股权。

暂不增持

此外，曾遭证券监督委员会提控盗用公款而淡出企业界的温有能，据说在丰升工业持股超过10%，且与蔡文杰同一阵线。

蔡文杰今日一一否认文告内容，表示只是讨论一些未来计划。

“我从来没有持有丰升工业33%股权。我个人甚至没有持有该股。我不知道温有能是否持有10%。”

“董事部应该会有股东名单，如果曾文秀说我们持有33至34%，请出示证明。”

他指出，通过Zenith间接持有丰升工业19.55%股权，目前并没有打算增持。

同时，他亦没有强制全面献购的打算。

温有能早前接受《The Edge》访问时也指出，他未持有丰升工业任何股权。

针对有否考虑罢免曾文秀，蔡文杰说，要看本周五举行的股东大会结果如何。

至于会否阻止曾文秀重选为董事，他不愿置评。

若受委董事 有信心转盈

蔡文杰指出，如果入驻董事部，有信心将丰升工业转亏为盈。

“蒙亏不代表无法更进一步发展，如果手握合约，我有信心将公司转亏为盈。”

“如果受委入驻董事部，我会履行我的职责。有信心产业发展和建筑合约将获利。”

他透露，Zenith手上的项目主要是产业发展和建筑，发展总值约10亿令吉。

除了注入资产，还有很多商业伙伴愿意颁发合约予该公司。

为何相中丰升工业？他说，该公司已将业务多元化至建筑，而且手握几项合约，相信是合适的工具。

冀证监会马交所介入

此外，蔡文杰对大马交易所在文告内容未经证实，而让这些具诽谤和不实的文告在网站发布，感到非常惊讶和痛心。

他希望马交所能提高警觉，以保障全体股东的权益。

他透露，将向证监会、马交所和大马公司委员会（CCM）投诉每一名董事，希望和要求证监会和马交所介入，并出席本周五举行的股东大会。

星洲網‧2014.06.17

【南洋网财经】

icy97

HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BHD

Type	Announcement
Subject	TRANSACTIONS (CHAPTER 10 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) NON RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF LEASEHOLD PROPERTY
The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company) is pleased to announce that the Company had on 19 June 2014 entered into a Sale and Purchase Agreements (“SPA”) with Dato’ Lim Thiam Huat (“the Vendor”) for the acquisition of a piece of leasehold property measuring approximately 40,480 square metres together with four (4) units of the warehouse and two (2) units of Tenaga Nasional Berhad station (“the Property”) for a total cash consideration of RM7.5 million (“Purchase Consideration”) (“Proposed Acquisition”). Further details of the Proposed Acquisition are set out in the attachment herein. This announcement is dated 20 June 2014. http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1663273

Attachments HCIB-Proposed Acqusition.pdf

icy97

Date of change	20/06/2014
Name	DATUK RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW
Age	42
Nationality	Malaysian
Type of change	Others
Designation	Managing Director
Directorate	Executive
Qualifications
Working experience and occupation
Directorship of public companies (if any)
Family relationship with any director and/or major shareholder of the listed issuer
Any conflict of interests that he/she has with the listed issuer
Details of any interest in the securities of the listed issuer or its subsidiaries

Remarks :

The resolution for re-election of Datuk Raymond Chan Boon Siew as director of the Company was not carried at the Annual General Meeting held on 20 June 2014.

icy97

風盛的豐盛

2014-06-22 19:59      
3年前，豐盛工業（HARVEST，9342，主板工業產品組）憑沙巴商人拿督曾文秀和首相之子納茲福丁的入股，吸引投機炒風湧至，結果股價在不到2個月時間飆升26倍，熱爆全場，迫使交易所祭出罕見的“指定股”降溫措施來防止炒風持續升級。

儘管在欠缺基本面支持和降溫措施阻喝下，豐盛股價後來漸遭打回原形，這一鬧卻儼然奠定了豐盛作為近年“炒股之王”的地位，至今未再有任何一隻炒股具有遭交易所套上“指定股”枷鎖的能耐。

經歷當年的短暫風光後，豐盛此後又開始沉寂下來，早前建議的各種發展方案至今再無下文，業績亦持續蒙虧，就連當時對豐盛前景“情有獨鍾”的曾文秀，也在近年來不斷拋售股權，將本身在豐盛的持股大幅降低至7%水平，當初入股豐盛時放下的豪言壯語，像雪人般不見啦。

意想不到的是，這樣的豐盛，近來卻又引起另一位沙巴商人蔡文傑的注意，不僅透過旗下滿禧投資（Zenith City）收購豐盛近20%股權，更要求委派3名代表入駐豐盛董事部，大有與曾文秀爭奪豐盛控制權的意味。

結果，兩人在5月12日進行了一次會談後，終於在1個月後爆發罵戰，甚至傳出兩個不同版本的談話內容。

首先，曾文秀指蔡文傑曾在談話中透露自己已掌握豐盛超過33%股權，並批評未提出全購的蔡文傑已經違法，豐盛董事部才會攔下其要求進入董事部的議案；蔡文傑聞訊後則反駁說絕無此事，強調自己並未持有豐盛33%股權，同時揚言將向曾文秀和豐盛董事部提出法律控訴，並要求監管當局予以監督。

據蔡文傑所言，他有意在未來把數項產業計劃注入豐盛，加上會有許多商業團體願意提供工作給自己的公司，有信心能帶領豐盛扭轉劣勢。

看這趨勢，就是“新白武士”要出手拯救“原白武士”拯救不了的豐盛工業就是了。

只是，白白虛擲了3年期待後，投資者如今是否還敢期待豐盛工業的未來？畢竟，這家公司這些年來，可是“風盛”多於“豐盛”啊！

至少個人認為，在“白武士”確實讓豐盛業務出現實質改善前，靜觀其變會是反應一切消息的最佳態度。（星洲日報／投資致富‧投資茶室：李三宇）

icy97

丰升工业委2执行董事

财经新闻 财经  2014-06-25 11:25
（吉隆坡24日讯）近日陷入管理层纠纷的丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）向马交所报备，委任曾文林（译音）和玛兹兰为执行董事。

文告显示，曾文林拥有企业管理硕士学术背景，目前在两家公司担任要职。

至于现年50岁的玛兹兰，曾任职首相署和交通部，现在为3家公司的高级管理人员。

上周五，丰升工业股东在股东大会中，拒绝让所有提案通过，当中包括了重新委任两名董事（其中一人为总执行长拿督曾文秀）的建议。

早前，公司掀起管理层的争执，拿督蔡文杰通过Zenith City投资，持有丰升工业19.55%股权，并提出要委任3名新董事，但却遭到公司拒绝。【南洋网财经】

Date of change	23/06/2014
Name	MAZLAN BIN MOHAMAD
Age	50
Nationality	Malaysian
Type of change	Appointment
Designation	Executive Director
Directorate	Executive
Qualifications	1984 – 1988 Northern University of Malaysia (UUM)Degree in Accounting - Member of Malaysian Institute of Accountant - Member of Institute of Association Port and Harbour (IAPH)
Working experience and occupation	1)Ramajuta (KL) Empire Development Sdn Bhd Position Deputy Chief Executive Officer Date Joined 2014 – present 2)Kawalan Keselamatan Ikhlas Sdn Bhd Position Managing Director Date Joined 2014 – present 3)Harvest Court Industrial Berhad Position Business Development Director Date Joined 2013 - Present 4)Penang Port Commission Position Senior Manager Finance and Management Services Ministry Of Transports Join Date (1994- 2013) 5) Anti-Corruption Agencies (ACA) Position Senior Investigation officer (SIO) Prime Minister Department Date Joined (1989 - 1994)

Date of change	23/06/2014
Name	CHAN BOON LIM
Age	37
Nationality	Malaysian
Type of change	Appointment
Designation	Executive Director
Directorate	Executive
Qualifications	Master in Business Administration ( MBA), University of Southern Queensland Australia(2006-2010) Diploma in Marketing (CIM)-(1995-1997)
Working experience and occupation	(1) MAGNIFICIENT DIAGRAPH (M) SDB BHD (CARREFOUR) Management Trainees (1997 – 1998) (2) ACCORD CONTAINER LINE (M) SDN BHD Warehouse Manager (1998-2000) (3) ACCORD LOGISTICS SDN BHD Operation Manager,( Air & Sea Freight)(Since 2000-2004) (4) SAGAJUTA (Sabah) SDN BHD Assistant Project Director (Since 2004 - todate) (5) NAIM INDAH CORPORATION BERHAD General Manager (Since 2012-todate)

icy97

Type	Reply to query
Reply to Bursa Malaysia's Query Letter - Reference ID	TE-140623-38877
Subject	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF LEASEHOLD PROPERTY
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF LEASEHOLD PROPERTY
(Unless otherwise defined in this announcement, all terms used herein shall have the same meaning as those defined in the announcement dated 20 June 2014) Reference is made to the Company’s announcement made on 20 June 2014. The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company) wishes to further announce that :- 1. The Property is currently tenanted to a timber pallet manufacturer. The built-up area of the warehouses and Tenaga National Berhad stations are approximately 152,000 sq ft and 1,400 sq ft respectively. The ages of the warehouses are approximately 10 years old. The information of the net book value of the Property based on the latest audited financial statements is not available as the Property was acquired from an individual. 2. The payment of the deposit amounted to 30% of the total Purchase Consideration is a condition requested by the Vendor in return for a discount from the initial offer price. The Company has been informed that the same condition was also made to other interested buyers. 3. The Company have no knowledge on the relationship between the Caveator and the Vendor and the reason for the Caveator to lodge the private caveat on the Property. However, as one of the condition precedent stated in the SPA, the Vendor shall at his own cost and expenses remove or caused to be removed the private caveat lodged by the Caveator and other encumbrances so that the Property is free from all encumbrances, lien, claim and caveat. 4. The production capacity and output for the existing operations factory for the past three (3) years are as follows :- 2011 2012 2013 Total (Tonnage) 7,421 11,941 22,643 With year 2013 production volume, the factory has utilised approximately 70% of its production capacity and would need extra space to cater the further expansion on the production volume. 5. The Malaysian Timber industry had suffered badly from the economy crisis since 2008 & 2009, and its effects spill over until today. This industry is capital and labour intensive, which will continue to face various challenges on the shortage of labour supply, production cost escalation due to inflation and the weakening of export markets. As a result, HCIB has made the decision to move away from is capital and labour intensive door manufacturing business and refocus on value-added timber related services like klin dry, machining and export bundling services, which enable the HCIB Group to generate better profit margin for sustainability of group bottom lines. The Group’s timber service production tonnages in the last three years have shown increased productivities. On the other hand, the strategic location of the existing plant in Klang is feasible to convert into industrial development with better return to unlock the value of land. The acquisition of leasehold property is capable for the future relocation and/or expansion of the existing timber service related business. 6. Board of Directors, having considered all aspects of the Proposed Acquisition, including but not limited to the salient terms of the SPA, the valuation report prepared by Henry Butcher Malaysia (NS) Sdn Bhd, rationale for the Proposed Acquisition and the financial effects of the Proposed Acquisition, is of the opinion that the Proposed Acquisition is fair and reasonable and is in the best interest of HCIB. 7. The valuation report from Henry Butcher Malaysia (NS) Sdn Bhd is available for inspection at the registered office of the Company at Suite 10.03, Level 10, The Gardens South Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200 Kuala Lumpur between 8.30 a.m. and 5.30 p.m. from Monday to Friday (except public holidays) for a period of three (3) month from 20 June 2014. This announcement is dated 24 June 2014.

icy97

豐盛工業股東大會計票失誤

2014-07-03 12:01      
（吉隆坡3日訊）豐盛工業（HARVEST,9342,主板工業產品組）解釋，公司在6月20日和7月1日公佈的股東大會投票結果之所以出現差異，主要因計票上的失誤。

該公司發文告解釋，股東大會計票員當時少算了90萬2千559萬股贊成票和重複計算了4萬7千股投給公司主席的股權，議案4和6的計票也發生了一些失誤，導致結果出現些許差異。

無論如何，上述變化料不會改變豐盛股東大會投票結果，因6項議案的反對票仍高達74.41%。（星洲日報／財經）

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - Outcome of the Thirty Sixth (36th) Annual General Meeting
Reference is made to the Company’s announcements made on 20 June 2014 and 1 July 2014 respectively.   The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company) wishes to further clarify the variance of the poll results was mainly due to the following reasons :- i) 902,559 shares represented by 12 proxies voted in favour were short count by the Scrutineers during the Annual General Meeting held on 20 June 2014 (“AGM”). Based on the proxy forms received, these 12 proxies should represent 1,028,559 shares which voted in favour for all the resolutions. However, only 126,000 shares were counted during the AGM. Therefore, there was a short count. ii) 47,000 shares voted in favour by Chairman of the Meeting were counted twice. This should be excluded as proxy holders already voted. iii) Calculation error for the Resolutions 4 and 6 on the shares voted for and against. This announcement is dated 2 July 2014.

icy97

蔡文杰告丰升工业诽谤

财经新闻 财经  2014-07-04 10:14
（吉隆坡3日讯）董事部斗争白热化的丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股），接到挑战派拿督蔡文杰的律师信，提告该公司的声明含诽谤。

丰升工业文告指出，蔡文杰是针对6月10日和19日向马交所报备的文告，称当中含有诽谤成分，因此发出律师信。

若该公司未在收到信函的14天内提出答辩或申明应诉，蔡文杰方面将会直接进行此诉讼案以获取判决，并不再通知被告方。

蔡文杰早前通过Zenith City投资，持有丰升工业19.55%股权，并提出委任3名新董事，但遭丰升工业拒绝。

丰升工业更在文告中指出，蔡文杰在与拿督曾文秀会面时，声称通过Zenith City和第三方投资者，持有33至34%股权，更指温有能持股逾10%，与他站同一阵线。

当时，该公司指蔡文杰无意提出强制全面收购（MGO），温有能也未有申报所持股权。

不过，温有能稍后否认这项消息，蔡文杰也反驳丰升工业的说法。【南洋网财经财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	MATERIAL LITIGATION
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) -Kuala Lumpur High Court Suite No. : 23NCVC-34-06/2014 Datuk Chai Woon Chet vs Harvest Court Industries Berhad & 6 Others
1. Date of presentation of the Writ and Statement of Claim The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce on 30 June 2014, the Company’s solicitors Messrs. Gideon Tan Razali Zainihas received the sealed copy of the Writ and Statement of Claim both dated 24 June 2014 from Messrs. Lim Chong Phang & Amy, the solicitors for Datuk Chai Woon Chet (“Plaintiff”). The Company is required within 14 days from the date of receipt of the Writ to enter appearance, failing which, the Plaintiff will proceed to obtain judgment against the Company without further reference to the Company. 2. The particulars of the claim under the Writ and Statement of Claim, including the amount claimed for and the interest rate Pursuant to the Writ and Statement of Claim, the Plaintiff is alleging that the Company’s announcements made on 10 June 2014 and 19 June 2014 respectively and the article published by the Edge on 20 June 2014 has defamed him. In view of this, the Plaintiff’s claims included the following :- General damages; Exemplary damages; Aggravated damages; Interest of 5% per annum calculated from the date of judgment sum until the date of full settlement; Injunction for restraining the Company to make further publishing or causing to be published any statement of defamation to the Plaintiff; An order to request the Company to publish a statement of apologies for the said statement of defamation on the media selected by the Plaintiff within 14 days from the date of judgment or within 5 days from the date of serving the judgment to the Company (whichever is earlier). Cost on full indemnity basis; and Any other order or relief granted by the Court. 3. Details of the default or circumstances leading to the filing of the Writ and Statement of Claim against HCIB   The said Writ and Statement of Claim was filed against the Company pursuant to the Company’s announcements made on 10 June 2014 and 19 June 2014 respectively and article published by the Edge on 20 June 2014 wherein the Plaintiff claimed that the same defamed him. 4. The financial and operational impact of the Writ and Statement of Claim on the Group The Writ and Statement of Claim is not expected to have any material financial and operational impact on the Group. 5. The expected losses, if any, arising from the Writ and Statement of Claim The Company is not expected to incur any further loss arising from the Writ and Statement of Claim. 6. Steps taken and proposed to be taken in respect of the Writ and Statement of Claim HCIB is seeking the necessary legal advice to resolve and/or defend against this matter. Further announcement on the development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad in due course. This announcement is dated 3 July 2014.

icy97

滿財報股東擬開特大 罷免豐昇工業4董事

企業財經8 Jul 2014 17:41
（吉隆坡8日訊）豐昇工業（HARVEST，9342，主要板工業）股東糾紛再起，2名股東以公司財政表現每況愈下為由，擬召開股東特別大會，罷免其中4名董事。

該公司向馬證交所報備指出，提出動議的兩大股東分別為滿禧投資有限公司（Zenith City Investment）及Syawaras私人有限公司，聯合持有該公司至少十分之一股權。

不過該公司亦在報備時指出，截至目前尚未接獲開會通知，故至今未確定會否召開特大。

文告中指出，豐昇工業本月4日接獲滿禧公司及Syawaras公司信函，建議8月8日召開特大立刻罷免拿督莫哈末阿米爾、黃偉漢（譯音）、再努利再納及吳文奇（譯音）4名董事。

文件中亦指出，一旦罷免上述4名董事后，將立刻尋求委任拿督斯里阿都阿茲姆、拿督蔡文傑及王貴華（譯音）擔任董事。

“在現有管理層領導之下，公司業績表現每況愈下，故決定罷黜該4名董事。”

兩大股東發布的聯合文告中亦指責，該公司長期依賴關聯公司交易收入，不過上財年最后還是轉盈為虧，全年虧損372萬令吉。【中国报财经】

HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BHD

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - Notice Received from Shareholders
The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company)wishes to announce that the Company had on 4 July 2014 received a Special Notice of intention to move resolutions pursuant to Section 128 and Section 153 of the Companies Act, 1965 (“the Act”) on removal and appointment of directors of the Company at a proposed Extraordinary General Meeting (“EGM”) to be called pursuant to Section 145 of the Act by Zenith City Investment Limited and Syawaras Sdn Bhd being the members of the Company collectively holding not less than one-tenth of the issued and paid up capital of the Company . However, the Company has yet to receive any Notice of Meeting pursuant to Section 145 of the Act as at todate and therefore there is no EGM convened as yet. Please refer to the attachment for further details. This announcement is dated 8 July 2014. http://www.bursamalaysia.com/market/listed-companies/company-announcements/1678721

Attachments HCIB - Notice from Shareholders.pdf

icy97

丰升工业管理层拒开特大

财经 2014年7月14日
（吉隆坡14日讯）丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业股）董事部以及管理层今天证实，不会处理最大股东拿督蔡文杰提出召开特大的要求，並指蔡文杰企图绕过强制全面献购（MGO），通过召开股东特大（EGM）入主董事局。        

蔡文杰是东马木材商丹斯里蔡景康长子，在今年入主了阿斯特拉（ASUPREM，7070，主板工业股）和XOX说（XOX，0165，创业板）。

丰升工业首席执行员拿督曾文秀和数名董事部成员，在今天召开的记者会公开一段今年5月14日他与蔡文杰的对话录音，证明蔡文杰曾说过自己间接拥有丰升工业33%-34%股权，並要求公司管理层接纳他进入公司董事部。

曾文秀也指蔡文杰向在电话中透露除了通过Zenith City投资有限公司和其他途径持有丰升工业超过33%股份，也得到来自FTEC资源前董事经理温有能的支持。

温有能是FTEC资源前董事经理，曾在2007年被证券监督委员会提控指其挪用公款，之后淡出股市。

曾文秀称蔡文杰在录音中提到有超过10%的丰升工业股权。

无论如何，温有能早前向媒体澄清，他对此事完全不知情，且没有拥有上述股份。

Zenith City在5月12日以及16日正式要求丰升工业在6月20日股东常年大会上，提出让蔡文杰和其他两名成员加入董事部，但最终被丰升工业以蔡文杰没有通知董事部他拥有33%以上股权，以及试图绕过强制全面献购理由而拒绝。

而蔡文杰也不甘示弱，於6月16日向媒体指出，他被以拿督曾文秀为首的董事部毁谤，並在7月1日对丰升工业提出诉讼，索赔1亿令吉。

在建议不被董事部接纳后，ZenithCity在7月4日提出於8月8日召开股东特大，以撤换4名现任董事局成员，並在7月11日把4800份股东特大通告，送到丰升工业办公室以发给各股东。

值得一提的是，丰升工业在6月20日举行的股东常年大会所提出的6项提案，都被超过70%选票拒绝，包括曾文秀的董事经理连任提案，因此目前曾文秀已不是丰升工业的董事经理，但保留首席执行员职位。

丰升工业顾问律师陈吉典指出，种种跡象证明，蔡文杰试图绕过强制全面献购来控制丰升工业。

按我国资金市场与服务法令（CMSA）下的併购条例，凡是收购一家上市公司33%及以上的股权者，便须向剩余股东提出全面献购。

他强调，曾文秀和丰升工业董事部是基於照顾小股东的利益而拒绝蔡文杰的提议。【东方网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	MATERIAL LITIGATION
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - Kuala Lumpur High Court Harvest Court Industries Berhad vs Zenith City Investments Limited, Datuk Chai Woon Chet & 32 Others
Reference is made to the Company’s announcements made on 10 June 2014, 19 June 2014, 30 June 2014, 3 July 2014 and 8 July 2014 respectively. The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company” or “the Plaintiff”) wishes to announce on 11 July 2014, the Company’s solicitors Messrs.Gideon Tan Razali Zainihas commenced an action in Kuala Lumpur High Court against Zenith City Investments Limited, Datuk Chai Woon Chet & 32 others (collectively as “Defendants”) as the Defendants have together acted in concert to breach Section 9(1) of the Malaysian Code on Take Overs and Mergers 2010 (“the Code”) for their failure to make a mandatory general offer to the Company’s shareholders. Pursuant to Section 217 of the Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (“the CMSA”), the Code is to be complied with. The Company believes that the Defendants together hold 33% or more of the Company’s shares and pursuant to Section 9(1) of the Code, it is mandatory for the Defendants to make a general offer to all the shareholders of the Company. The Defendants’ failure to make such mandatory general offer affects the interest of the Company’s shareholders particularly the minority shareholders. Thus, the Company/Plaintiff claims from the Defendants either jointly and/or severally the following Orders in the aforesaid civil action:- i) a declaration that the Defendants together held 33% or more shares in the Plaintiff company; ii) a mandatory injunction compelling the Defendants either jointly and/or severally make a general offer to all the Plaintiff’s shareholders in accordance to the rules and regulations; iii) costs incurred by the Plaintiff to hold another general meeting; iv) general damages; v) interest at the rate of 5% per annum from the date of judgment until the date of full settlement; vi) costs based on indemnity basis; and vii) such further and/or other relief deemed fit and appropriate by this Honourable Court. Further announcement on the development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad in due course. This announcement is dated 14 July 2014.

icy97

大股东登报召开特大 丰升工业： 不符正规

财经新闻 财经  2014-07-25 11:57
（吉隆坡24日讯）丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）董事部表示，两名大股东Zenith City投资及Syawaras私人有限公司，并没有按照正规程序，刊登召开股东特别大会的通告。

7月11日，两名大股东在一些报章上刊登通告，在8月8日召开特大。

对此，丰升工业发文告指出，根据1991年法令第34条文，从获得大股东召开特大的要求起，该公司拥有高达21日的时间作出回应。

大股东是在7月4日要求召开特大。

该公司指，在董事部有机会考虑该要求前，两名大股东已直接在报章上刊登通知，且在公司的注册办公室留下4800份通知书。

因此，有关特大的通知未能发给股东。

此外，丰升工业表示，在法令第145条文下召开特大，该两名股东必须自己负责进行。
“由于Zenith City投资及Syawaras不是依据法令第144条文要求召开特大，所以，公司没有义务替该两名大股东通知股东。”

另外，丰升工业也强调，该公司起诉Zenith City投资、拿督蔡文杰和其他32人没有进行强制全面收购，违反大马收购与并购法令第9（1）条文的法律诉讼案仍在进行中。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - NOTICE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING TO BE CONVENED PURSUANT TO SECTION 145 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1965
The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce the Company was informed that two Shareholders, namely Zenith City Investments Limited (“Zenith”) and Syawaras Sdn Bhd (“Syawaras”) had advertised a Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting (“EGM”) to be convened pursuant to Section 145 of the Companies Act, 1965 (“the Act”), in New Straits Times and Utusan Malaysia dated 11 July 2014. However, the Company is of the view that no proper EGM is convened for the 8 August 2014 for the reasons stated below: - 1. Although Zenith and Syawaras have requested for the Record of Depositors (“ROD”) on 4 July 2014, the Company should have up to 21 days to response from date of receipt of their requestin accordance withSection 34 of the Securities Industry (Central Depositories) Act 1991. 2. Before the Board of Directors had the opportunity to consider the request, Zenith and Syawaras had gone ahead to advertise the Notice of EGM on newspaper on 11 July 2014 and left 4,800 copies of Notice of EGM and Circular at the Company's registered office. Therefore, the Notice of the EGM had failed to be circulated to the shareholders. The Company is of the view that an EGM convened under Section 145 of the Act is the sole responsibility of the shareholder to organize. There is no obligation on the Company to circulate the Notice of EGM on behalf of the shareholders, Zenith and Syawaras, given that the meeting requested is not requisitioned under Section 144 of the Act; and 3. In view of the current on-going litigation between the Company and Zenith, Datuk Chai Woon Chet & 32 others (collectively as “Defendants”) as the Defendants have together acted in concert to breach Section 9(1) of the Malaysian Code on Take Overs and Mergers 2010 (“the Code”) for their failure to make a mandatory general offer to the Company’s shareholders. The litigation was announced by the Company on 14 July 2014. This announcement is made on 23 July 2014.

icy97

丰升工业终止2合约

财经新闻 财经  2014-07-26 11:15
（吉隆坡25日讯）丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）终止两项未动工合约，分别是森美兰的纸浆和白纸工厂，以及沙巴亚庇的综合发展计划。

根据文告，由于在上月的股东大会上，更新授权股东以进行与营收或交易性质关联交易的议案，未被通过，因此终止这两项工程，并发函通知有关合作伙伴。

其中，子公司丰升工业建筑在2011年11月，获1Green颁发合约，在森美兰兴建利用油棕空果串生产纸浆和白纸的工厂。

亚庇的1Likas综合发展计划，则是与Sagajuta（沙巴）私人有限公司合作。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	TRANSACTIONS (CHAPTER 10 OF LISTING REQUIREMENTS) RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - PROPOSED DIVERSIFICATION AND PROPOSED RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (“PROPOSALS”)
Reference is made to the Company’s announcements made on 19 December 2011, 25 June 2012, 29 June 2012, 11 October 2012, 31 December 2012, 31 January, 2013, 4 February 2013, 29 March 2013, 31 May 2013, 4 June 2013 and 20 June 2014. The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce that Harvest Court Construction Sdn Bhd (“HCCSB”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company had on 25 July 2014 entered into a Cancellation Agreement with 1Green Enviro Sdn Bhd (“1Green”) to terminate the Letter of Award dated the 21 November 2011 issued by 1Green to HCCSB (hereinafter referred to as “LOA”) in relation to the appointment of HCCSB for the Design, Procurement, Manufacture, Construction and Commissioning of the proposed pulp and paper plant to process oil palm empty fruit bunches at Mukim Serting Ulu, Daerah Jempol, Negeri Sembilan (“1GE Project”) by way of mutual consent with no claim against the other for any expenses, costs or charges that may have been incurred or arisen by reason of the said LOA. HCCSB had also via its letter dated 25 July 2014 informed Sagajuta (Sabah) Sdn Bhd (“Sagajuta”) that HCCSB has no longer wish to participate in the construction of the proposed mixed development on Lot TL017546879 at Teluk Likas, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah (“1 Likas Project”) as per the Letter of Undertaking dated 23 November 2011 issued by Sagajuta to HCCSB (hereinafter referred to as “LOU”). The LOA and LOU was terminated due to majority of the shareholders of the Company have at its Annual General Meeting held on 20 June 2014 voted against the resolution pertaining to the renewal of the Shareholders’ Mandate for Recurrent Related Party Transactions of a Revenue or Trading Nature. At the same time, both 1GE Project and 1 Likas Project have not commenced the work as of to date. The termination of LOA and LOU is not expected to have any material effect on the earnings, net asset and gearing of HCIB Group for the financial year ending 31 December 2014. This announcement is dated 25 July 2014.

icy97

曾文秀減持股權 豐昇工業特大取消

財經股市7 Aug 2014 20:32
（吉隆坡7日訊）豐昇工業（HARVEST，9342，主要板工業）內部糾紛下的2大股東，協議取消原訂明日（8日）召開的股東特別大會，稍晚亦報備總執行長拿督曾文秀減持股權。

豐昇工業向馬證交所報備，該兩大股東分別為滿禧投資有限公司（Zenith City Investment）及Syawaras私人有限公司，本月6日（週三），在法庭達致取消召開特大協議。

報備文告指出，上述2家公司早前同意，該公司在7月11日召開特大內容無效，並建議8月8日再次召開特大，隨著特大取消，該公司通過吉隆坡高庭起訴滿禧投資和Syawaras申請亦告無效。

另外，豐昇工業今日稍晚亦報備，總執行長曾文秀在7月31日，以每股24.6仙價碼脫售公司105萬股持股，脫售計劃完成后仍持公司1767萬股或6.29%股權。

豐昇工業全日窄幅波動，開市小幅揚0.5仙至27.5仙水平，之后就在正負間區遊蕩，閉市收26.5仙，跌0.5仙，較曾文秀脫售價溢價1.9仙，成交量596萬5000股。【中国报财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	OTHERS
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) -NOTICE OF EXTRAORDINARY GENERAL MEETING (“EGM”) TO BE CONVENED PURSUANT TO SECTION 145 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 1965
Reference is made to the Company’s announcements made on 23 July 2014 pertaining to the above matter. Further to that, the Company has filed a suit against Zenith City Investments Limited and Syawaras Sdn Bhd vide Kuala Lumpur High Court Originating Summons No.:24NCC-244-07/2014 for a declaration that the Notice of Extraordinary General Meeting (“EGM”) dated 11 July 2014 is invalid and/or defective, and an application to injunct and restrain the holding of the EGM on 8 August 2014. The above application was fixed for hearing at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on 6 August 2014. The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce that at the hearing on 6 August 2014, Zenith City Investments Limited and Syawaras Sdn Bhd gave an undertaking to the Court that they will not convene and/or hold the EGM on 8 August 2014 pursuant to their Notice of EGM dated 11 July 2014. The Company’s Originating Summons No.:24NCC-244-07/2014 is now fixed for Case Management on 11 August 2014. This announcement is dated 7 August 2014.

Name	DATUK RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW
Address	11A, Jalan USJ 18/2A, 47630 Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan
NRIC/Passport No/Company No.	720814-08-6161
Nationality/Country of incorporation	Malaysian
Descriptions (Class & nominal value)	Ordinary Share of RM0.25 each
Name & address of registered holder	DATUK RAYMOND CHAN BOON SIEW 11A, Jalan USJ 18/2A, 47630 Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan

Details of changes

Currency: Malaysian Ringgit (MYR)

Type of transaction	Date of change	No of securities	Price Transacted (RM)
Disposed	31/07/2014	1,050,000	0.246

Circumstances by reason of which change has occurred	Disposal of shares via open market transactions
Nature of interest	Direct
Direct (units)	17,669,675
Direct (%)	6.29
Indirect/deemed interest (units)	0
Indirect/deemed interest (%)	0
Total no of securities after change	17,669,675
Date of notice	07/08/2014

icy97

豐昇工業 收到Syawaras原訴傳票

企業財經13 Aug 2014 23:20
（吉隆坡13日訊）豐昇工業（HARVEST，9342，主要板工業）報備，收到由Syawaras私人有限公司律師發出日期為7月30日的原訴傳票。

豐昇工業向馬證交所報備，該案件今日在高等法庭進行聆訊。

Syawaras曾在7月8日向大馬公司委員會申訴，並要求該會調查豐昇工業和拿督林天發（譯音）之間簽署的買賣協議。

Syawaras指控豐昇工業董事局在敲定協議過程中，並未為公司爭取最佳利益，因此就尋求申請禁令阻止豐昇工業執行或解決該買賣協議，直到大馬公司委員完成調查為止。

豐昇工業指出，正尋求必要法律咨詢解決和維護該指控，原訴傳票料不會影響公司財務和運作。

豐昇工業股價並沒受打擊，全日穩步攀高遊走介于25.5仙至26仙，閉市微揚0.5仙收在25.5仙，全日成交量290萬3200股。【中国报财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	MATERIAL LITIGATION
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - Kuala Lumpur High Court Suite No. : 24NCC-258-07/2014 Syawaras Sdn Bhd vs Harvest Court Industries Berhad & 7 Others
(1) Date of presentation of the Originating Summons and Notice of Application The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce that on 11 August 2014, the Company has received the sealed copy of the Originating Summons dated 30 July 2014 and Notice of Application dated 31 July 2014 from Messrs. Wong Kian Kheong, the solicitors for Syawaras Sdn Bhd (“Plaintiff”). The Originating Summons and Notice of Application have been fixed for hearing on 13 August 2014 at Kuala Lumpur High Court. (2) The particulars of the claim under the Originating Summons and Notice of Application, including the amount claimed for and the interest rate Pursuant to the Originating Summons and Notice of Application, the Plaintiff informed that they had on 8 July 2014 lodged a complaint to Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (“SSM”) and requested SSM to investigate the Sale and Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) entered between Dato’ Lim Thiam Huat ("the Vendor") and the Company on 19 June 2014 as the Plaintiff is alleging that the Board of Directors of the Company at the material time was not acting in good faith and in the best interest of the Company during the process of finalising the said transaction. In view of this, the Plaintiff’s claims included the following :- i) An order to prohibit the Company to implement and/or resolve the SPA until :- a) the conclusion of the investigation from SSM; and b) decision from the Prosecutor whether any charge will be filed against the Board of Directors at the material time and the Vendor ii) cost incurred for this application and any other cost to be paid by the Board of Directors at the material time and the Vendor; and iii) Any other order or relief granted by the Court. (3) Details of the default or circumstances leading to the filing of the Originating Summons and Notice of Application against HCIB The Company had on 20 June 2014 made an announcement to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad (“Bursa Securities’) in relation to the SPA entered with the Vendor for the acquisition of a piece of leasehold property measuring approximately 40,480 square metres together with four (4) units of the warehouse and two (2) units of Tenaga Nasional Berhad station for a total cash consideration of RM7.5 million (“Proposed Acquisition”). The Plaintiff is alleging that the Board of Directors of the Company at the material time was not acting in good faith and in the best interest of the Company during the process of finalising the Proposed Acquisition. (4) The financial and operational impact of the Originating Summons and Notice of Application on the Group The Originating Summons and Notice of Application is not expected to have any material financial and operational impact on the Group. (5) The expected losses, if any, arising from the Originating Summons and Notice of Application The Company is not expected to incur any further losses arising from the Originating Summons and Notice of Application. (6) Steps taken and proposed to be taken in respect of the Originating Summons and Notice of Application The Company is seeking the necessary legal advice to resolve and/or defend against this matter. Further announcement on the development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Securities in due course. This announcement is dated 13 August 2014.

icy97

入禀高庭要开特大 丰升挑战派再罢4董事

财经新闻 财经  2014-08-16 12:15
（吉隆坡15日讯）丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）挑战派再出招，继无法在上周五（8日）召开特大后，大股东Zenith City和Syawaras入禀高庭，要求再召开特大罢黜4名董事。

根据文告，挑战派称丰升工业没有提供股东存票记录，上周不能召开特大。

欲委3新董事

挑战派此次要求再召开特大，罢黜独立非执行主席拿督莫哈末阿米尔、执行董事黄伟汉（译音）、独立非执行董事再努里及独立非执行董事吴文义（译音），并委任拿督蔡文杰、黄桂华和拿督斯里阿都阿津3名新董事。

丰升工业回应，在挑战派于7月4日要求索取存票记录后，公司实则有21天的时间回应要求，而董事部还未来得及考虑，前者已经在报章上刊登特大广告。

同时，挑战派将4800份特大通知书放在丰升工业的注册办公室，而根据上市条例，要求召开特大的股东必须负起全责，而该公司并无责任派发此通知书。

再者，挑战派在高庭审讯时已经承诺，不会在上周五召开特大。

丰升工业的斗争愈演愈烈，当权派日前更公布与蔡文杰的录音，指后者与另32人为“一致行动人士”，持股权已超过33%，但却为启动强制全面献购（MGO）。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	MATERIAL LITIGATION
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - Kuala Lumpur High Court Suite No. : 24NCC-257-07/2014 Zenith City Investments Limited and Syawaras Sdn Bhd vs Harvest Court Industries Berhad
(1) Date of presentation of the Originating Summons The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce that on 12 August 2014, the Company has received the sealed copy of the Originating Summons dated 30 July 2014 from Messrs. Wong Kian Kheong, the solicitors for Zenith City Investments Limited (“Zenith”) and Syawaras Sdn Bhd  (“Syawaras”) (collectively as “Plaintiffs”). The Originating Summons has been fixed for hearing on 13 August 2014 at Kuala Lumpur High Court. (2) The particulars of the claim under the Originating Summons, including the amount claimed for and the interest rate The Plaintiffs is alleging that the Extraordinary General Meeting (“EGM”) proposed to be held on 8 August 2014 was impracticable to call due to the Company’s failure to provide the Record of Depositors (“ROD”) as requested by the Plaintiffs. In view of this, the Plaintiffs filed this Originating Summons to have an EGM convened by the Court for the purposes of passing the Resolutions under Section 150 of the Companies Act, 1965 (“the Act”). Pursuant to the Originating Summons, the Plaintiffs’ claims included the following :- i) An order to convene an EGM by the Company pursuant to Section 150 of the Act , to consider and if though fit, passing the following resolutions :- Ordinary Resolution No. 1 - Removal of Director “THAT Dato’ Mohamed Amir Abas bin Zainal Azim be and is hereby removed from office as a director of the Company, with immediate effect." Ordinary Resolution No. 2 - Removal of Director "THAT Ng Wai Han be and is hereby removed from office as a director of the Company, with immediate effect." Ordinary Resolution No.3 - Removal of Director "THAT Zainuri bin Zainal be and is hereby removed from office as a director of the Company, with immediate effect." Ordinary Resolution No.4 - Removal of Director "THAT Woo Mun Chee be and is hereby removed from office as a director of the Company, with immediate effect." Ordinary Resolution No. 5 -Appointment of Director "THAT Dato' Seri Abdul Azim bin Mohd Zabidi having consented to act as a director, be and is hereby appointed as Director of the Company with immediate effect." Ordinary Resolution No. 6- Appointment of Director "THAT Datuk Chai Woon Chet having consented to act as a director, be and is hereby appointed as Director of the Company with immediate effect.” Ordinary Resolution No. 7- Appointment of Director "THAT Wong Kwai Wah having consented to act as a director, be and is hereby appointed as Director of the Company with immediate effect." Ordinary Resolution No.8-Removal of Director(s) "THAT if any person(s) (other than persons named in Ordinary Resolutions 5 to 7 above) is appointed as a director of the Company at any time from 1 July 2014 up to and including the time of the conclusion of this Extraordinary General Meeting (including any adjournment thereof), each such person be and is here removed from office as a director of the Company, with immediate effect." (collectively as “the Resolutions”) ii) An order for the manner of EGM being called, held or conducted and any other ancillary and consequential orders which is deemed expedient by the court; iii) An order to the Company to provide a copy of ROD within 21 days from the date of Judgment or any period which deem appropriate to expedite the EGM but not less than 3 market days before the date of EGM; iv) parties are at liberty to make any applications thereafter; v) Costs; and vi) Any other order or relief deemed fit and proper to be granted by the Court. (3) Details of the default or circumstances leading to the filing of the Originating Summons against HCIB On 4 July 2014, the Company received a Special Notice of Intention to move the Resolutions pursuant to Section 128 and Section 153 of the Act at a proposed EGM to be called on 8 August 2014 pursuant to Section 145 of the Act by the Plaintiffs. On 11 July 2014, the Plaintiffs advertised a Notice of EGM pursuant to Section 145 of the Act, in New Straits Times and Utusan Malaysia. However, the Company is of the view that no proper EGM is convened for the 8 August 2014 for the reasons stated below: - i) Although the Plaintiffs have requested for the ROD on 4 July 2014, pursuant to Section 34 of theSecurities Industry (Central Depositories) Act 1991, the Company has 21 days from date of receipt of their requestto respond. ii)  Before the Board of Directors had the opportunity to consider the request, the Plaintiffs had gone ahead to advertise the Notice of EGM on newspaper on 11 July 2014 and left 4,800 copies of Notice of EGM and Circular at the Company's registered office. Therefore, the Notice of the EGM was not circulated to the shareholders. The Company is of the view that an EGM convened under Section 145 of the Act is the sole responsibility of the shareholder to organize. There is no obligation on the Company to circulate the Notice of EGM on behalf of the Plaintiffs, given that the meeting requested is not requisitioned under Section 144 of the Act; and iii) In view of the current on-going litigation between the Company and Zenith, Datuk Chai Woon Chet & 32 others (collectively as “Defendants”) as the Defendants have together acted in concert to breach Section 9(1) of the Malaysian Code on Take Overs and Mergers 2010 (“the Code”) for their failure to make a mandatory general offer to the Company’s shareholders. The litigation was announced by the Company on 14 July 2014. Further to that, the Company has also filed an action against the Plaintiffs vide Kuala Lumpur High Court Originating Summons No.: 24NCC-244-07/2014 for a declaration that the Notice of EGM dated 11 July 2014 is invalid and/or defective, and an application to injunct and restrain the holding of the EGM on 8 August 2014. The above application was fixed for hearing at the Kuala Lumpur High Court on 6 August 2014. At the hearing held on 6 August 2014, the Plaintiffs gave an undertaking to the Court that they will not convene and/or hold the EGM on 8 August 2014 pursuant to their Notice of EGM dated 11 July 2014. The Plaintiffs is alleging that the proposed EGM was impracticable to call due to the Company’s failure to provide the ROD as requested by the Plaintiffs. In view of this, the Plaintiffs filed this Originating Summons to have an EGM convened by the Court for the purposes of passing the Resolutions under Section 150 of the Act. (4) The financial and operational impact of the Originating Summons on the Group The Originating Summons is not expected to have any material financial and operational impact on the Group. (5) The expected losses, if any, arising from the Originating Summons The Company is not expected to incur any further losses arising from the Originating Summons. (6) Steps taken and proposed to be taken in respect of the Originating Summons At the hearing held on 13 August 2014, the Court has fixed for further case management on 19 August 2014 for the hearing of the said Originating Summons. The Company is seeking the necessary legal advice to resolve and/or defend against this matter. Further announcement on the development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Securities in due course. This announcement is dated 15 August 2014.

icy97

诉蔡文杰等人被撤销 丰升工业再入禀法庭

财经新闻 财经  2014-08-29 09:22
（吉隆坡28日讯）丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）起诉拿督蔡文杰等共34造的诉讼案，遭高庭主动销案。

丰升工业向马交所报备，吉隆坡高庭今日撤销该案，公司已重新入禀法庭，因法庭未聆审案件论点。

丰升工业7月入禀法庭，起诉蔡文杰、大股东Zenith City投资和其他32人，没有进行强制全面收购，违反大马收购与并购法令第9（1）条文。

蔡文杰此前亦入禀法庭，起诉公司和其他6人，在6月10日和19日发出含有诽谤成分的声明。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	MATERIAL LITIGATION
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - Kuala Lumpur High Court Harvest Court Industries Berhad vs Zenith City Investments Limited, Datuk Chai Woon Chet & 32 Others
Reference is made to the Company’s announcement made on 14 July 2014. The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce that The Kuala Lumpur High Court Suit No. 22NCC-250-07/2014 between HCIB against Zenith City Investment Limited, Datuk Chai Woon Chet & 32 Others has been struck out by the Kuala Lumpur High Court on 28 August 2014 by the Court’s own motion. The Company is entitled to re-file the action again as the merits of the matter has yet to be heard and/or determined. The Company has already re-filed the action again into Kuala Lumpur High Court on 28 August 2014. Further announcement on the development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad in due course. This announcement is dated 28 August 2014.

icy97

SUMMARY OF KEY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 30/06/2014

		INDIVIDUAL PERIOD		CUMULATIVE PERIOD
		CURRENT YEAR QUARTER	PRECEDING YEAR CORRESPONDING QUARTER	CURRENT YEAR TO DATE	PRECEDING YEAR CORRESPONDING PERIOD
		30/06/2014	30/06/2013	30/06/2014	30/06/2013
		$$'000	$$'000	$$'000	$$'000

1	Revenue	1,230	7,613	2,897	11,595
2	Profit/(loss) before tax	-2,496	-798	-3,829	-1,634
3	Profit/(loss) for the period	-2,496	-828	-3,789	-1,644
4	Profit/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent	-2,476	-828	-3,789	-1,644
5	Basic earnings/(loss) per share (Subunit)	-0.92	-0.42	-1.42	-0.83
6	Proposed/Declared dividend per share (Subunit)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
		AS AT END OF CURRENT QUARTER		AS AT PRECEDING FINANCIAL YEAR END
7	Net assets per share attributable to ordinary equity holders of the parent ($$)	0.1868		0.1955

icy97

丰升申请撤销诽谤案遭驳回

财经新闻 财经  2014-09-27 11:26
（吉隆坡26日讯）丰升工业（HARVEST，9342，主板工业产品股）遭高庭驳回撤销诽谤案的申请。

丰升工业向马交所报备，吉隆坡高庭周二（23日）驳回公司申请。

丰升工业目前已针对高庭的裁决提出上诉。

公司7月初接获拿督蔡文杰的律师信，通过Zenith City投资起诉公司和其他6人，于6月10日和19日发出含有诽谤成分的声明。

公司即申请撤销Zenith City投资的起诉与索偿。【南洋网财经】

Type	Announcement
Subject	MATERIAL LITIGATION
Description	HARVEST COURT INDUSTRIES BERHAD (“HCIB” or “the Company”) - Kuala Lumpur High Court Suite No. : 22NCC-197-06/2014 Zenith City Investment Limited vs Harvest Court Industries Berhad & 6 Others
Reference is made to the Company’s announcements made on 10 June 2014 and 19 June 2014. The Board of Directors of Harvest Court Industries Berhad (“HCIB” or “the Company”) wishes to announce that at the hearing held on 23 September 2014, the Court has disallowed the Company’s application to strike out the Plaintiff’s Writ and Statement of Claim (“the Decision”). The Company has instructed the solicitors to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the Decision. Further announcement on the development of the above matter will be made to Bursa Malaysia Securities Berhad in due course. This announcement is dated 26 September 2014.