佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

查看: 1086|回复: 2

【Eratat Lifestyle FO8 交流专区】鳄莱特 ERATAT LIFESTYLE LIMITED

[复制链接]
发表于 31-5-2014 10:01 AM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
请教各位,是否知道Eratat Lifestyle(中国谔莱特)出了什么事?为何停止交易这么久?谢谢。


公司官网:http://www.eratatgroup.com/v2/ 本帖最后由 icy97 于 20-6-2014 01:36 AM 编辑

回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 1-6-2014 02:38 AM | 显示全部楼层
做假账
公司的钱不见掉。。。更本就是骗人的把戏。。。
中资股还是摆脱不了——————骗局。
不是所有的中资是那样的。。。但是这种局面最少有70%上市公司都在玩的游戏。

http://infopub.sgx.com/FileOpen/Eratat-Update_of_Events.ashx?App=Announcement&FileID=299611
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-7-2014 10:57 AM | 显示全部楼层
Why This 80% Winner for Me Is Still a Bad Mistake
By Stanley Lim, CFA - June 30, 2014 | See also: FO8^STI
http://www.fool.sg/2014/06/30/wh ... till-a-bad-mistake/

Investing, like all things in life, requires a little bit of luck. Basically, if you buy shares only for a month or even a year, you’d require a lot of luck to make money. However if you plan to hold it for 20 years, luck’s role in the eventual outcome would diminish greatly though it might still exist a little.

The following is a story of me getting lucky, but in the process, it also taught me about the relationship between luck and time.

What did I buy?

I bought into a particular S-Chip in 2012 at an average price of about S$0.08 per share. This was after the confidence in S-Chips amongst the investing public in Singapore had fallen to a low following a number of high-profile scandals related to frauds and accounting irreggularities. Investors were wary of S-Chips and had pushed their valuations down.

The particular S-chip I invested in was trading way below its net-cash value at that time – i.e., the company’s market capitalization was lower than the value of its total cash on hand after deducting all its debts. On top of that, the company had been paying consistent dividends and was trading at just 1 times trailing earnings. To put into perspective what a low valuation the share had at that time, the Straits Times Index (SGX: ^STI) was valued at 8.7 and 10.6 times trailing earnings as of the end of 2011 and 2012 respectively.

At that time, I thought the market had overreacted regarding the whole S-Chip issue and there was bound to be a turnaround in market sentiment for S-chips as a whole in the future. To sweeten the deal, I would even be paid regular dividends while waiting for the turnaround in sentiment. Sounds good right? Wrong!

The share in question is Eratat Lifestyle (SGX: FO8), a men’s apparel retailer in China. A potential red flag regarding the company’s operations first arose in June 2013 when it issued some warrants and non-convertible bonds to a Hong Kong-based finance company, Sun Hung Kai & Co. Ltd.

The effective interest rate for Eratat’s bonds, which have a maturity of only two years, would have been about 16.7% a year. This happened at a time when the company was supposed to have more money in its bank than its entire market capitalisation. Even from just a business perspective (without even thinking about any possible unethical conduct), the logic of borrowing at such high interest rates while having plenty of cash on hand didn’t seem to make much sense to me.

I sold off my stake soon after Eratat issued its bonds and managed to pocket a profit of 80% within a year of “investing” in this company.  However, it was a big mistake on my part to even invest in this company in the first place. My assumptions for investing into the company were wrong: The general market had not overreacted to certain S-chips and Eratat was not really trading below its net-cash value (since there was no cash to speak of in the first place – more on this shortly).

Since January this year, Eratat has been suspended from trading after the company defaulted on interest payments for its bonds. Subsequently, news broke that the cash balance in the company might have been fabricated.

Foolish Takeaway

What is highlighted here is: There are times in investing when we can make money even when we are wrong. Similarly, there will be times we would lose money even when we are right. With Eratat, it definitely was a situation in the former.

This also brought to mind how important the element of time is in being able to largely negate the element of luck, as mentioned earlier.

I was able to make money on the Eratat “investment” purely because I was lucky and the time frame was short (I had sold within a year). If I had stayed invested for the longer term, my investment would now be frozen due to the suspension and I would most likely lose 100% of my capital. It is important to know that although the market can be irrational in the short run, the truth will always catch up in the long run.

It’s also good practice to distinguish between luck and skill for our successful investments. Luck-based investments, while it might make for good memories, cannot be depended upon for continued success. Correctly recognising skill-based investments on the other hand, can help you become a better investor if the process behind such investments are internalised and then repeatedly practiced.
本帖最后由 icy97 于 2-7-2014 01:42 PM 编辑

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 20-4-2024 06:09 PM , Processed in 0.063098 second(s), 24 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表