国际刑警正式拒绝大马警方要求通缉克莱尔

abc74

纳吉要求国际刑警在全球通缉砂拉越报告总编辑克莱尔，结果被国际刑警打了退票，更宣称克莱尔可以继续通畅无阻的周游全世界。

国际刑警不但正式拒绝大马警方的要求，不会发出红色警戒通缉令Red Notice，更毫不客气的指责大马警方已经滥用了国际刑警的规条。

国际刑警Interpol在829 Bersih 4.0和平大集会举行前夕，正式致函通知位于伦敦的非政府组织【国际公平审判】Fair Trials International，表示国际刑警总部已经拒绝了大马警方要求针对砂拉越报告总编辑克莱尔发出【红色警戒】拘捕令的事项。

国际刑警认为大马警方在要求通缉克莱尔的文件上无法提出合理的证据证明克莱尔犯罪；同时谴责大马警方已经滥用了国际刑警用以全球通缉恐怖份子的程序，把克莱尔列为恐怖份子是毫无根据而且荒谬。

国际刑警也声明，克莱尔可以像往常一样自由出入全球190个有国际刑警网络的国家和地区。

纳吉想滥用国际刑警条规勒令克莱尔封口的行动，彻底失败了！而就算马来西亚继续封锁砂拉越报告网站，也不能阻止克莱尔继续向全世界揭发纳吉更多的臭底。

简单的说，纳吉已经失去国际司法和执法机构的信任和敬重；一马公司丑闻和26亿私人赃款丑闻，已经使得纳吉面对国际的时候完全抬不起头，也使得大马人民在国际间抬不起头。

REFUSED! - INTERPOL Rejects Najib's 'Red Notice' Request Against Sarawak Report
28 Aug 2015

Terrorism laws have been widely abused to silence media criticism of Najib in Malaysia

INTERPOL have moved swiftly to publish their refusal of Malaysia’s request to issue an international ‘Red Notice’ alert for the arrest of Clare Rewcastle Brown, Editor of Sarawak Report.

In a letter to the London based NGO Fair Trials International today the Secretary General of INTERPOL, Jurgen Stock, informed that the global police organisation has decided to reject Malaysia’s request outright.
In a personally signed letter, headed ‘Subject Clare Rewcastle Brown’, the Secretary General confirmed he had been in receipt of a request by Malaysia, which was reviewed on 9th August in line with their standard operating procedure and that the Red Notice had been refused.

The Secretary General went on to assure Fair Trials, which had written for confirmation about the status of the journalist, that all 190 member countries of Interpol had been informed of this decision, meaning she can travel internationally without further harassment or fear of arrest.

Crushingly, Jurgen Stock added that member countries were further advised not to used Interpol’s channels in this matter and requested to remove all data from their databases as well – it is a telling indication that the organisation is of the opinion that their processes, which are designed to catch dangerous criminals, had been abused by Malaysia.

The letter addressed to Jago Russell, the Director of Fair Trials stated:
“Whilst INTERPOL does not usually comment on specific cases or individuals, in the light of the significant press interest in this case we can confirm that INTERPOL’s General Secretariat did receive a Red Notice request for Clare Brown from Malaysian authorities.

In line with our standard operating procedure a review was conducted and on 9th August the request for the Red Notice was refused. All 190 member countries were informed of the decision and advised not to used INTERPOL’s channels in this matter and also requested to remove any data from their national databases.”

Segment of the letter from INTERPOL
Abuse of Interpol a growing concern

Fair Trials had taken up the case as an example of what the NGO regards is a worrying trend on the part of certain oppressive regimes to abuse INTERPOL in order to clamp down on legitimate dissenters.

According to a warrant issued by a Kuala Lumpur court on 4th August the charges against the Sarawak Report Editor were under Section 124B and 1241 of the Penal Code, which form part of new laws brought in by Najib Razak in 2012, supposedly to counter terrorism.

Mohamad bin Salleh, the Director of the Crime Investigation Department of the Royal Malaysia Police then issued a triumphant press release, announcing that Interpol and Aseanpol would be immediately alerted with a view to gaining extradition of the journalist from countries worldwide.

The grounds for the supposed criminal offence simply do not exist in most countries, however, and hardly appear to merit equating a female journalist with the armed hijackers and terrorists who are normally placed on this list.

124B. Whoever, by any means, directly or indirectly, commits an activity detrimental to parliamentary democracy shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to twenty years.

124I. Any person who, by word of mouth or in writing or in any newspaper, periodical, book, circular, or other printed publication or by any other means including electronic means spreads false reports or makes false statements likely to cause public alarm, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years.

Press Notice from the Royal Malaysia Police this month
The Malaysian authorities then compounded the extra-judicial flavour of their proceedings by bragging to the media that the Inspector General of Police had raised the issue with Jurgen Stock personally and was confident as a result of getting a ‘good outcome’ for the request:
“Federal police are confident of Interpol’s cooperation following discussions between Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar and Interpol secretary-general Jurgen Stock during the Asean police chiefs meeting in Jakarta, Indonesia this week.”

Fair Trials had pointed out to INTERPOL that such attempts at back room influence-peddling violated the due processes of the organisation and INTERPOL’s reply again indicates that the international police organisation equally disapproves of Malaysia’s lack of proper standards of procedure.

Triumphalism in pro-Najib media was ill judged.

The move against Sarawak Report was part of a wider clamp down on the Malaysian media and opposition leaders, which has come in the wake of revelations about the misappropriation of funds from the One Malaysia Development Berhad fund (1MDB) and the discovery of hundreds of millions of dollars allegedly ‘donated’ into Prime Minister Najib Razak’s personal bank accounts.

The arrest warrant was issued shortly after Sarawak Report published the scoop that the former Attorney General had been in the process of drawing up a charge sheet against the Prime Minister himself in the hours before he was summarily sacked by Najib.

The thinly disguised attempt to silence journalists using this inappropriate measure of a Red Notice drew international attention as a result.
A petition by the German NGO Rainforest Rescue on behalf of Sarawak Report and condemning the arrest warrant raised an astonishing 60,000 signatures within a few days in Germany alone (Jurgen Stock’s home country).

Rainforest Rescue, which has joined the condemnation over the destruction of Borneo, was on the point of launching further petitions in Spanish and English to raise further international awareness before this announcement was made by INTERPOL.

The news that the international policing organisation has rejected Malaysia’s attempt to use its powers and authority to clamp down on legitimate expression and criticism of corruption in the country comes as a serious blow to the Malaysian Prime Minister’s own authority on the even of the anti-corruption march by the Bersih (clean) movement this weekend.

It once again brings into question the Malaysian Prime Minister’s judgement in handling the growing criticisms against his government and his apparent failure to understand how others now view the situation facing his own administration.

http://www.sarawakreport.org/201 ... nst-sarawak-report/

kaikainote8

打它的屁股，它哪裡還有臉

句子Sentence

都是想要封口的错

逍遙

在国内横冲直撞 颠倒黑白
自大惯了 还以为Interpol也要听他的

小东北

他身为国家的领导，搞到这样的地步，还要死撑，名誉已经在国际上扫地咯。。。。

yk13

哈哈哈，又害我们再一次下sui了~~~

gogolive

新闻消息来源可疑，华人已不是第一次捏造新闻来诋毁首相了。除非是国营报社或电台报道的消息，不然我们人民对华人发布的一律采取不信任态度。

mann07

楼上的，消息来源是当今大马，你孤陋寡闻就算了。
什么【我们人民】云云，请就此打住。

mann07

What a joke!
国际刑警要收捐款吗？我们有的是钱！

dogdogman

gogolive 发表于 29-8-2015 09:57 AM
新闻消息来源可疑，华人已不是第一次捏造新闻来诋毁首相了。除非是国营报社或电台报道的消息，不然我们人民 ...

我们人民？
还是我们巫统死忠支持者？

leo3_puff

很大的一巴掌掃在納吉的臉上，「啪」大大聲的響

mann07

那鸡要出律师信了，问国际刑警这是什么意思。

12A123

这是“国际警察”和“鸡养的警察”的不同了

Kanzaki.H.Aria

dogdogman 发表于 29-8-2015 10:42 AM
我们人民？
还是我们巫统死忠支持者？

这应该是lovemy那杂种开的小号

仓底货

为什么大马不派特务003去把她解决掉？

lovebe11a

其实克莱尔没说做出滔天大罪，没有必要出动国际刑警来协助。这是肯定的吧。
要190个国家的成员协助 未免也太高估自己的权力吧。
现在比较需要的是找出泰国爆炸案的凶手!