佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

查看: 2315|回复: 40

你知道自己的權力嗎?

[复制链接]
发表于 11-2-2016 01:26 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 NewFuture 于 11-2-2016 01:36 PM 编辑

自己Ctrl+C Ctrl+V去Google吧!



http://www.straitstimes.com/sing ... 5149903#xtor=CS1-10

Singaporeans need to know their legal rights

Kok Xing Hui


The recent suicide of a teenager after he was questioned by the police has spurred debate and calls for public education about rights
When I was 17, I spent a night in the lockup of Tanglin Police Division - the price I paid for using a school senior's identity card to try and get into a club.

I had been curious about a party many of my junior college schoolmates were at, but the door girl saw through my youthful indiscretion and called the police.

In the cold cell they put me in, I was filled with regret, and desperately worried about being kicked out of school.

I needed to call my parents, and at least let them know where I was past 3am that Saturday morning.

At that time, all I knew about police arrests was what I had seen on American TV programmes. So I was under the misguided notion that I would get one phone call and could call my parents and ask them to come and get me.

It was only later that I realised Singapore takes a different approach, and its reasons for doing so.


In my case, my parents were notified of my arrest at 2pm, after my statement was taken and they were needed to post bail.

That incident provided instant education on my legal rights - something many Singaporeans are seemingly oblivious about.

WHAT ARE YOU ENTITLED TO?

In Singapore, the police can detain a person for 48 hours while they investigate.

The person arrested can request to inform his family or a lawyer of his arrest, ask for a visit from them or to consult a lawyer, but the police can delay that if they think it might interfere with investigations.

The law here is that the accused has the right to legal counsel but that right may not be exercised immediately upon arrest, but only within what the authorities consider a reasonable timeframe.

"This strikes a balance between an accused's rights and the public interest in ensuring thorough and objective investigations," Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam said in Parliament in 2010.

Whether that balance shifts over time remains to be seen. For now, people should be aware of their legal rights within the current system.

Criminal lawyers Sunil Sudheesan and Amolat Singh, with a combined 33 years of experience, estimate that at least eight in 10 of their clients do not understand their legal rights.

Experts and lawyers suggested a combination of reasons for this.

The common man does not expect to be arrested, so does not think he needs to know; education efforts, while growing, are still lacking; and there is a high amount of trust in local institutions.

"There is this view that it won't happen to us because we don't intend to break the law," said National University of Singapore sociologist Paulin Straughan.

"Singapore police also have a good reputation - they are viewed as not corrupt and upright.

"There is very little reason for us to not expect that the police will guard our rights."

This is a testament to the way the police operate here, and the processes they have in place.

While in the United States, there is growing distrust and criticism against the men in blue, the system that evolved in Singapore has kept its crime rates among the lowest in the world - an achievement that those on the right side of the law sometimes take for granted.

Still, knowing one's rights is good for a society built on the rule of law, said Singapore Management University law don Eugene Tan, a former Nominated Member of Parliament. "If a person has basic understanding of his rights and chooses to assert them, we will have justice delivered," he explained.

Associate Professor Straughan said: "If you don't have trusted officers in place, then you become vulnerable and easily victimised."
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

 楼主| 发表于 11-2-2016 01:29 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
A CRITICAL DIFFERENCE

Criminal lawyers say knowing your rights can make a critical difference.

Mr Amolat Singh recounted the 1994 Oriental Hotel murder case, in which his client Abdul Nasir Amer Hamsah was accused of murdering a Japanese tourist in her hotel room. "It was only at the trial that he was saved from the gallows," said Mr Singh.

The interpreter who took the accused's statement had wrongly translated the Malay word "pijak", which means step, as stomp - and that led the court towards believing he had an intention to murder.

"One word like that could have sent him to death. After the interpreter explained that in court, the murder charge was reduced to robbery with hurt," said Mr Singh.

He believes it is crucial for Singaporeans to know how to handle the police statement. They need to know that they have the right to amend or delete any part of the statement before they sign it.

Mr Sudheesan said: "A person can potentially be convicted on a statement that is inaccurate. If statements are paraphrased, sometimes the person transcribing may change the meaning unintentionally.

"That affects the accuracy of the statement."

Under Section 22 of Singapore's Criminal Procedure Code, any person being questioned by the police "shall be bound to state truly what he knows of the facts and circumstances of the case".

But immediately after come the words, "except that he need not say anything that might expose him to a criminal charge, penalty or forfeiture" - the right against self-incrimination.

Still, the courts can and have drawn adverse findings if a suspect does not put forward a defence of his innocence to the police.

If these arguments are raised only in court, the judge may not believe them.

Mr Sudheesan said: "Unfortunately, people only realise these issues too late."

The Law Society of Singapore is working to get more people to know the law. Last April, it launched a four-page "pamphlet of rights" to help the public better understand their rights in the course of a criminal investigation, search or prosecution.

Mr Wendell Wong, co-chairman of the society's criminal law practice committee, said: "We recognise that information about legal rights during investigations may not be easy for members of the public to find or understand without the assistance of lawyers.

"The pamphlet is meant to enhance access to information and justice."

To add more transparency to the investigation process, the Ministry of Home Affairs is also piloting a system in which questioning sessions are recorded. Mr Wong said: "We believe this is a step in the right direction."

WHAT MORE TO DO

Knowing one's legal rights is also the first step to understanding criminal procedures, and paves the way for citizens to make informed decisions about whether the current system provides enough protection to suspects and whether there is a need for change.

Concerns were raised recently over the case of a 14-year-old boy who fell to his death after being taken to a police station from school and then arrested for molestation.

His parents had asked why the teen was handed over to the police by his school and why his mother was not allowed to see him during the investigation, or be with him when he was being questioned.

As far as stakeholders know, the police were operating as normal, and seemed to take the boy's age into consideration.

For instance, he was questioned in an open-plan office.

Still, some people, such as Mr Singh, point out that while the Children and Young Persons Act goes a long way in ensuring there is protection for minors when they enter the court system, there is little legislation on how they should be treated before they are charged.

He said: "Young suspects are also not called 'accused' but 'offenders'; they are sent to the boys' home and not jail. The legislation has taken great pains to try and handle young offenders very differently from adults.
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 11-2-2016 01:30 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
"But when it comes to arrest and questioning, the laws for adults and minors are not very different."

Experts are calling for youth to be treated as a vulnerable group, and to have an appropriate adult alongside during questioning.

Associate Professor Tan said: "As a parent, I absolutely wouldn't want my child to be overwhelmed by that experience."

Criminal lawyers, through the Law Society and the Association of Criminal Lawyers Singapore (ACLS), have long been calling for suspects to have immediate access to counsel .

"We have engaged and continue to engage the Home Ministry, Ministry of Law and the Attorney-General on this issue," said Mr Wong.

"Sometimes you need a lawyer just to answer questions," said Mr Sudheesan, who is also the acting president of the ACLS.

"Lawyers can advise you to list down your core defence, because if you don't say it now, the judge is less likely to believe it later.

"But you might not do that if you think you can just keep silent."

These are important issues and members of society need to get involved in the discussion on what is the best balance between giving police the tools- including the option of being firm when needed - to do their job and ensuring that the young, and other vulnerable groups such as the mentally disabled, are protected.

But such debates require that citizens know what the rules are, and where the trade-offs lie, to avoid unhelpful finger-pointing.

As Mr Singh said: "It's a fine balance between the public interest of keeping society safe and the rights of a suspect.

"But rights bring about a level playing field."

At the same time, "we must not become so fixated by the notion of 'rights' that we miss out on what they ought to facilitate", said Prof Tan.

In my teenage brush with the law, I would have appreciated it very much if the police had let me speak to my parents.

But at the same time, staying overnight in that cell ensured that I learnt my lesson.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Straits Times on February 11, 2016, with the headline 'S'poreans need to know their legal rights'.
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 11-2-2016 02:20 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
在华文站放 wall of text.....
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 11-2-2016 02:31 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
要自己GOOGLE TRANSLATE不如自己上网看新闻...
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 11-2-2016 02:32 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
蛇仔明 发表于 11-2-2016 02:31 PM
要自己GOOGLE TRANSLATE不如自己上网看新闻...

好聰明哦!

回复

使用道具 举报

Follow Us
发表于 11-2-2016 02:33 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
没被法律裁决前每个人都是无罪的。BENJAMIN现在是永远无罪了。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 11-2-2016 03:09 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
蛇仔明 发表于 11-2-2016 02:33 PM
没被法律裁决前每个人都是无罪的。BENJAMIN现在是永远无罪了。

有LT不認為如此叻!


回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 11-2-2016 03:16 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
NewFuture 发表于 11-2-2016 03:09 PM
有LT不認為如此叻!

基督教徒也不认同,他们居然说每个人都有罪...
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 12:44 AM | 显示全部楼层
还有什么可以complain的,含吧朗拿出来讲吧~
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 04:49 AM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 12-2-2016 04:56 AM 编辑

假如不在大马交通违规, 就不怕拖欠罚款而被交警拦截。

若不在电梯内非礼小女生, 就不怕被审问时不懂自己的权利。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 12-2-2016 05:52 AM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 NewFuture 于 12-2-2016 05:54 AM 编辑

http://www.allsingaporestuff.com ... benjamin-lims-death

CHEE SOON JUAN: WHY IS SHANMUGAM SILENT ABOUT BENJAMIN LIM'S DEATH?


In October last year, a 4-year-old boy fell to his death from an open window that had no grilles. Back then, Mr K Shanmugam spoke up very promptly, writing on his Facebook:

“One can understand the parents’ anger, anguish. To lose a child like this because someone has not done what he is supposed to have done. And the conduct after the tragedy is shocking. There must be steps taken against such contractors – if what the father says is correct. We must help the family to get legal recourse. It won’t bring back the child, but there has to be some justice done. I have told them we will help find a lawyer for the family.”

Mr Shanmugam was angry – and justifiably so. Still, his aggressive tone was surprising. After all, he didn't possess, at least at the time he wrote his post, all the facts pertaining to the episode.

This is why his silence on the Benjamin Lim's matter is especially disturbing (Mr Shanmugam is the Minister for Home Affairs as well as the Minister for Law). In Benjamin's case, the police have even, in not so many words, admitted culpability when they said they would review the procedure when it came to questioning minors.

Yet, the Minister has not uttered a word or even commiserated with the Lim family. The silence is awkward, to say the least.

Chee Soon Juan
Singapore Democrats
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 10:36 AM | 显示全部楼层
谢谢分享
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 10:55 AM | 显示全部楼层
蛇仔明 发表于 11-2-2016 03:16 PM
基督教徒也不认同,他们居然说每个人都有罪...

當然有罪‥和女人有關的影像,每天在我腦海中閃過不止千百次‥
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 10:59 AM | 显示全部楼层
ya4dang1 发表于 12-2-2016 10:55 AM
當然有罪‥和女人有關的影像,每天在我腦海中閃過不止千百次‥

谢谢分享
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 11:01 AM | 显示全部楼层
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 12-2-2016 11:24 AM | 显示全部楼层

大家咁话啧
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 02:29 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
ya4dang1 发表于 12-2-2016 10:55 AM
當然有罪‥和女人有關的影像,每天在我腦海中閃過不止千百次‥

专家说,正常的男人每半个小时一次性幻想,不正常的男人每次性幻想半个小时。你是那个?
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 02:32 PM | 显示全部楼层
蛇仔明 发表于 12-2-2016 02:29 PM
专家说,正常的男人每半个小时一次性幻想,不正常的男人每次性幻想半个小时。你是那个?

根據專家的定義,我比一般正常的男人還要正常十倍‥
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 12-2-2016 02:37 PM 来自手机 | 显示全部楼层
ya4dang1 发表于 12-2-2016 02:32 PM
根據專家的定義,我比一般正常的男人還要正常十倍‥

小心想太多会导致海绵体出现瘀血...

评分

参与人数 1人气 +3 收起 理由
ya4dang1 + 3 惡意灌水

查看全部评分

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 28-3-2024 06:01 PM , Processed in 0.074775 second(s), 28 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表