合股被告问题？？？？

amai5399

This Agreement is made on the 19th day of May 2010 BETWEEN HENG  NRIC No. 85 of 120, Taman In,Selangor. of Son Hair Studio & Academy (hereinafter referred to as the FirstParty’) of one part ;

AND

KOH  NRIC No: 690 of 1-1504 Bandar Villa Kondo, Jalan Pandan Indah1/16, 51100, Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan (KL)(hereinafter referred to as the Second Party’’) of one part ;

WHEREAS :

1.
That, First Party isthe registered proprietor of Sassoon Hair Studio & Academy (BusinessRegistration No.: 004184-W) to be transferred to Second Party.

2.
During the periodfrom 1st January 2009 until 18 May 2010, all the risk and rewardsshall be shared equally by the person tabulated below:

Name
NRICNo.

Heng

Koh

Tan

Chong

Chan

3.
The sum of Ringgit Thirty Four Thousand (RM34,000.00) only


being the consideration for the said business herebyacknowledged. The said amount shall be made in Fifteen(15) days from the agreement date. This considerationinclude the purchase of the Fixed Assets, shares, rental of the businesspremises (tenancy agreement) and etc of SanHair Studio & Academy Business.The consideration will be paid as the following manner.

Name
ChequeNo
Amount(RM)

Heng
AMB 667317
17,000.00

ChanP
AMB 667316
17,000.00

TOTAL
34,000.00

4.
It was agree thatthe First Party shall agreed upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set out.

NOW THIS AGREEMENT WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS :

1.
The First Party herebyacknowledges the Second Party as the proprietor of the business and agrees totransfer all the risk and rewards to the Second Party effective from date of transfer.

2.
The First Party and Ms. Chan  will at the request of the Second Party to leave or to shift out from thebusiness premises in 15 working days from the agreement date in such manner asthe Second Party dictates.

3.
The First Party and Ms. ChanPoh Yung with effect from 18th May 2010 will not be involve
in all matters of the business. However Ms.Chan Poh Yung shall be employed by Second Party, under Sassoon Hair Studio & Academy with a salary of RM1,800.00until the existing (April) intake students complete the academy.

Ms. Chan PohYung will continue working with the SassoonHair Studio & Academy at her discretion.

4.
The First Party has the right torequest for all the invoices and receipts that have been issued or received fromthe period from 1st January 2009 to 31st December 2009.This is in line with the requirements of the Inland Revenue Board of Malaysia.

5.
Upon all the said conditionspertaining to this Agreement have been fulfilled and the Second Party name isregistered as registered proprietor thereof and the terms pertaining theretoduly performed and satisfied pursuant to the provision of this Agreement theobligations of the First Party hereunder shall cease but without prejudice toany claims by the Second Party for any antecedent breach.

6.
This Agreement shall bind theirrespective heirs, personal representative and successor-in-title of the FirstParty and of the Second Party.

IN WITNESSETH WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals on theday and year first above written.

Signed, sealedand delivered
)

By the FirstParty in the said
)

)          HENG

NRICNo.

In the presenceof
)

Signed, sealedand delivered
)

By the SecondParty in the said
)

)
KOH

NRIC No:

In the presenceof
)

有一位学生在我卖股之前，报名了我前公司的一个与外面学院合作的课程，在我专卖股份后，现任股东（还没买给转名给他前也是由这股东负责这事的）告诉他已经报了名之类的事，然后经过学生自己的调查，发现原来没有报到名，现在这外面学院要告我前公司。

现在我在这份合约下我需要负责吗？？？

heng 是我

koh是现在的股东

derekting2u

如果那“学生”成功告SanHair Studio & Academy。你需要负责50%的赔偿。你股东“Koh” 在那事件playing what role is immaterial from the legal point of view.

amai5399

如果那“学生”成功告SanHair Studio & Academy。你需要负责50%的赔偿。你股东“Koh” 在那事件playing wha ...
derekting2u 发表于 13-12-2010 10:35 PM

如果那学生可以做证，由头到尾都是koh和他接触，而koh也在我离开后对他说“报了名之类的话”，而不是说之前没的股东没帮你报到名
。而且这事件在我还没离开时都是koh处理的，公司帐也是koh管的，我完全不知道他没报到名，也不知道他怎样找外面这间学院回来~现在外面这间学院也是要告San hair studio & academy利用他的学院名誉来骗钱，而我现在已转卖给koh了，我还需要负责吗？？？
谢谢回答！

derekting2u

只要是哪个“学生”或是“外面这间学院”告“San hair studio & academy”，全部partner都要附上责任。（“San hair studio & academy”，因该是partnership，对吗？）你的Agreement没有indemnify你在“San hair studio & academy”，between 01/01/09-18/05/10的liability.
除非他们告“KOH”而已，不然你是跑不了的。尝试跟KOH商量要他负全责。

amai5399

只要是哪个“学生”或是“外面这间学院”告“San hair studio & academy”，全部partner都要附上责任。（“ ...
derekting2u 发表于 14-12-2010 09:08 AM

之前公司只是我一个人的名罢了，不过是五个人合资；这情况下呢？？
之前公司只是我一个人的名罢了，不过是五个人合资这情况下被他们告，我能不能以因为koh一直处理这事，而我一律不清楚“外面这间学院”的来源是怎样，因为从头到尾都是koh找回来的，也是koh一个人在招生。


如果学生可以作证此事是因koh而令“外面的学院”要告san hair studio,我能不能要求“外面学院”只告koh？？？（因为我在位时，他对这学生说“外面学院”已报名只是人数不够，我离开或她又对学生说“如果你要退钱，”外面学院“已报名了钱只能退一半”学生才自己找上“外面学院”才揭发者事的。这样的话我能不能把这事置身以外？？？

amai5399

2.
During the periodfrom 1st January 2009 until 18 May 2010, all the risk and rewardsshall be shared equally by the person tabulated below:
1.
The First Party herebyacknowledges the Second Party as the proprietor of the business and agrees totransfer all the risk and rewards to the Second Party effective from date of transfer.

这两条条约是不是有点矛盾？
还是The First Party herebyacknowledges the Second Party as the proprietor of the business and agrees totransfer all the risk and rewards to the Second Party effective from date of transfer.对我有利？？？

derekting2u

因为你是sole proprietor，任何事情发生，你有错没错都要负责。如果他们愿意只告“KOH”，那就没问题了。不过你认为他们会吗？如果告“KOH'，对方会考虑到KOH有能力还吗。告san hair studio比较方便，如果不还就apply writ of seizure and sale你的asset。而且不用烦恼可以hold "KOH" personal liable。
那两个clauses是没有矛盾的。你要读完全部的Agreement，你的date of transfer 是19/05/10。所以说01/01/09-18/05/10发生的事件，你是要负责是对的。

amai5399

apply writ of seizure and sale你的asset是我现在名下的资产，还是San hair studio & academy的资产？

derekting2u

你名下的资产，因为你已经把San hair studio & academy卖了，不过你可以拿这Agreement 要KOH负责50%。如果他不还，你就apply writ of seizure and sale，贩卖San hair studio & academy的资产。
其实你被告了吗？

郭靖

如果到现在没告你有很大的机会不用负责。如果在还没签agreement前告你，你也有机会不用负全责。

amai5399

如果到现在没告你有很大的机会不用负责。如果在还没签agreement前告你，你也有机会不用负全责。
郭靖 发表于 14-12-2010 06:48 PM

   怎样说？？？？