各位大大麻烦帮我看看解决这个问题选哪种方式最好?帮我分析分析。data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/114c7/114c71dcad57668581745176f365403dea392843" alt="".gif)
backgroundAsrequested by a potential tenant, the Architect issued an instruction to theMain Contractor (MC) adding false ceiling to podium levels PL-3 and PL-4 (the samestandard/specification as the false ceiling in podium level PL-1 and PL-2). TheMC refused using the B.Q. rate for the assessment of the newly added falseceiling to PL-3 and PL-4 based on the following grounds:- (i) The B.Q. rate was substantially underpriced because ofpricing error. (ii) There were substantial increases in the total quantitiesof false ceiling as a result of the variation. (iii) Although the false ceiling to be used inPL-3 and PL-4 was the same type as that in PL-1 and PL-2, the ceiling height inPL-3 and PL-4 was almost two metres higher than that in PL-1 and PL-2.
please advise the following :
1.Contractual provisions for the valuation of variationworks.
2.Main Contractor’s argument for using fair ratevaluation instead of using B.Q rate
3A contractual implication of deleting all the ceilingworks from the B.Q and employing another contractor to carry out the ceilingworks.
|