查看: 7632|回复: 57
|
有沒有人試過U S A N A營業補助
[复制链接]
|
|
本帖最后由 hck82003 于 1-11-2010 11:36 PM 编辑
U S A N A營養補助品,有沒有人試過? 可以分享嗎? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 1-11-2010 11:34 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 1-11-2010 11:54 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 12:43 AM
|
显示全部楼层
众所周知,一般水溶性的维他命C,能够在人体力存在4小时,过后就排出人体,Ester C可以存在8个小时,是可以 ...
Carlos_L_Ber 发表于 1-11-2010 11:54 PM
每一个行业都有害群之马,尤其是直销商,很多直销商为了拼业绩就叫你“买多多,吃多多”。
一般上直销商都会有产品训练,上了几堂课,auntie 都变营养专家。
它家的维他命C是NON-ACIDIC MINERAL ASCORBATES YIELD 比抗坏血酸ASCORBIC ACID ,能在血液中提供更高维生素C的份量及效能,而且能维持维生素C在血管内较长时间,是不是24小时就不得而知了,一般一天补充两粒非5粒。
钙片是calcium citrate + Magnesium ,维生素D3, Boron & Silicon 。
我本身认为U产品是我所见过的营养补充品中最好的一个牌子。
值得推荐的是它的基本营养素套装:
1。以Beta Carotene取代维他命A。
2。强化维他命C而没有铁质的成分。
考虑到正常人每日所需而不会以分量吸引人购买,同时也符合了营养品潜在毒性的安全问题。
不要以直销商或“受薪”专家的讲解来考量一个产品的好坏。
我全家人都是U的长期顾客。
不讲太多了,等下那个P版主又来扣分了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 01:29 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 02:58 AM
|
显示全部楼层
我读biomedical sciences,可是看了还不是很明白 哪一位是读nutrition或food sciences的可否进 ...
Carlos_L_Ber 发表于 3-11-2010 01:29 AM
你可以到新加坡或马来西亚的Mims官方网页 http://www.mims.com.my/
注册一个名字然后Search Űsana Poly-C,里面有比较可靠的资料。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 10:08 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 10:35 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 11:02 PM
|
显示全部楼层
额额
我对于这间公司在各网站宣称自己的维他命C是最好的说法
Carlos_L_Ber 发表于 3-11-2010 10:35 PM
我想这些应该是它的直销商,并不是这间公司。
Silicon gives stability to all the connective tissues of the body and is essential for proper calcium utilization. Silicon is key to the calcium mineralization of the bone matrix。。
或许你可以到直销版请教“专家”。。。
http://cforum6.cari.com.my/viewthread.php?tid=1741205&extra=page%3D3&page=53
好的定义因人而异,对我来说,只要是物有所值就很足够了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 11:19 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 11:45 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 3-11-2010 11:53 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 12:48 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 01:07 AM
|
显示全部楼层
guardian 或watson卖才RM139, 240粒
Carlos_L_Ber 发表于 3-11-2010 11:19 PM
营养品的价值不是以"分量" 来衡量的,一般auntie 只会比较分量和价格,所以1000mg的维他命C特别好卖. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 01:23 AM
|
显示全部楼层
营养品的价值不是以"分量" 来衡量的,一般auntie 只会比较分量和价格,所以1000mg的维他命C特别好卖 ...
sam2838 发表于 4-11-2010 01:07 AM
重点在于,这个品牌的维他命C在功能上没有超越ester C,但价钱却高很多,而且钙质的配方也不见得比其他综合gluconate, citrate和lactate的钙质突出,同样的却比他们贵很多,所以还是以研究学者的观点来看待这个产品,简单地说,何其他滞销产品一样,供销不见得比目前市场上已有的突出,价格却贵很多,详细读这公司所提供的报告就知道了 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 01:38 AM
|
显示全部楼层
重点在于,这个品牌的维他命C在功能上没有超越ester C,但价钱却高很多,而且钙质的配方也不见得 ...
Carlos_L_Ber 发表于 4-11-2010 01:23 AM
你的观点很好,如果早三年前你提出的话,他家创办人所获颁的Albert Einstein Award 就冻过水... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 01:45 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 Carlos_L_Ber 于 4-11-2010 01:46 AM 编辑
In March 2007, xxxxxxxx was accused by Barry Minkow, an executive of the Fraud Discovery Institute of operating an illegal pyramid scheme.[37] An informal investigation was undertaken by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission concluded in January 2008 with the SEC recommending that no action be taken against the company.[38] xxxxxxxx lodged suits against Minkow and his company claiming defamation and stock manipulation. xxxxxxxx dropped the defamation suit and in March 2008 U.S. District Judge Tena Campbell threw out four of the five claims brought by xxxxxxxx against Minkow ruling that xxxxxxxxs claims violated California’s anti-SLAPP law for suing Minkow for fair criticism.[39] and that xxxxxxxx did not show a reasonable probability of winning on those claims.[40] The judge also cited two examples where xxxxxxxx failed to refute Minkow's claims that their products were overpriced and of no better quality than other lower-priced brands.[41] The remaining charge of stock manipulation was settled in July 2008 when xxxxxxxx and Minkow reached an undisclosed settlement, which included the removal of all xxxxxxxx-related materials from the Fraud Discovery Institute website, a related Chinese website, and from YouTube. Minkow also agreed to never trade in xxxxxxxx's stock again.[42] Court documents show that xxxxxxxx never pursued others whom they suspected of being part of the alleged stock manipulation nor did they ask for an injunction, their only avenue of release in this case.[40]
这不是我的观点,全部都有记录在案的,当初我也有参与调查 这个公司的确没有办法证明他的产品比其他人好,也没办法证明它炒高的价钱是物有所值的。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 01:49 AM
|
显示全部楼层
你的观点很好,如果早三年前你提出的话,他家创办人所获颁的Albert Einstein Award 就冻过水...
sam2838 发表于 4-11-2010 01:38 AM
The Albert Einstein Award (sometimes mistakenly called the Albert Einstein Medal because it was accompanied with a gold medal) was an award in theoretical physics that was established to recognize high achievement in the natural sciences. It was endowed by the Lewis and Rosa Strauss Memorial Fund in honor of Albert Einstein's 70th birthday. It was first awarded in 1951 and included a prize money of $15,000,[1][2] which was later reduced to $5,000.[3][4] The winner was selected by a committee (the first of which consisted of Einstein, Oppenheimer, von Neumann and Weyl [5]) of the Institute for Advanced Study, which administered the award.[2] Lewis L. Strauss used to be one of the trustees of the institute.[6]
哪一位是他的家人?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 01:54 AM
|
显示全部楼层
The company states that, as of 2009, its products are marketed in the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea, Singapore, Mexico, Malaysia and The Philippines. From 2004 to 2006, xxxxxxxx was named on Forbes “200 Best Small Companies” list.[9]
During 2007, xxxxxxxx faced repeated controversy as several of its executives were discovered to have made false statements regarding their qualifications.[10] These included Denis Waitley, a member of the board of directors,[11] Ladd McNamara, who quit the company's medical advisory board after it was discovered his license to practice medicine had been revoked,[12][13][14] the Vice President of Research and Development, Timothy Wood, who was found to have doctorate in forestry, as opposed to biology as he had claimed,[15] and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Gilbert Fuller, who had continued to use the title of CPA,[16] though his license had lapsed.[15][17]
In 2007, xxxxxxxx was not included on Forbes' 200 Best Small Companies” list, and an article in the magazine quoted industry and government experts who had raised questions about xxxxxxxx’s business practices and products.[18][19]
很抱歉,全部都有经过调查,记录在案,我不想干扰你们的活动,但在这里应该容许学术性的讨论吧, 这些都是我曾经参与过的调查,虽然我只是负责文书工作的小角色 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 4-11-2010 02:05 AM
|
显示全部楼层
Some of the original Herbalife weight loss products contained the active ingredient Ma Huang or Sida cordifolia, two herbs containing ephedrine alkaloids. Herbalife stopped using ephedrine in its products in 2002 after several U.S. states banned supplements containing botanical sources of ephedrine alkaloids.[26][27] The U.S. Food and Drug Administration banned supplements containing ephedra in 2004.[28]
Scientific studies in 2007 by doctors at the University Hospital of Bern in Switzerland and the Liver Unit of the Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center in Israel found an association between consumption of Herbalife products and hepatitis.[29][30] In response, the Spanish Ministry of Health issued an alert asking for caution in consuming Herbalife products.[31] Herbalife has stated they are cooperating fully with Spanish authorities.[32]
In May 2008 the Fraud Discovery Institute, which claims to be a consumer watchdog organization, reported that laboratory test results of Herbalife products showed lead levels in excess of limits established by law in California under Proposition 65.[33][34]
不是要针对任何品牌,只想说明,保健品一旦传销化,就会产生我所展示的问题,品质下降,价格升高,上述例子甚至加入有害成分 所以选择保健品,绝对不能听取销售商的一面之词,必须自己调查。。。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|