佳礼资讯网

 找回密码
 注册

ADVERTISEMENT

查看: 1439|回复: 5

S.173(h)(iii)Criminal Procedure Code 能否有效解释Prima facie这词???

[复制链接]
发表于 27-3-2010 07:46 PM | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本帖最后由 bahasa_cina 于 21-10-2011 09:07 PM 编辑

S.173(h)(iii)Criminal Procedure Code 是一条新条例, 他是为了解释prima facie 一词所篇.
1.但是它是否正真的解决prima facie这次的模糊性呢?
2.Prima faci 是不是用maximum evaluation test 呢?
3.现在的maximum evaluation test是不是像Edgar Joseph Jr 所说的proof beyond reasonable doubt 来呢?

敬请各位法律同仁发表意见....
回复

使用道具 举报


ADVERTISEMENT

发表于 30-3-2010 01:39 PM | 显示全部楼层
回复 1# bahasa_cina


    At the year of 2010, the latest development of degree of proof required to establish prima facie can be divided into 2 views. 1st view is that the degree of proof at the close of prosecution’s case is the maximum evaluation which stated in the case of Looi Kow Chai & Anor v Public Prosecutor. it means the maximum evaluation does not mean beyond reasonable doubt although the degree of evaluation is the same. In the cases of Deputy Public Prosecutor v Peter ak Merupi @ Mansor bin Abdullah, there is another view which is that the degree of proof at the end of close of prosecutor’s case is that applying the maximum evaluation means applying the beyond reasonable doubt test at the close of prosecution’s case.
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-4-2010 09:58 PM | 显示全部楼层
我猜你可能是CLP学生。读一读你的课本,就会找到答案啦。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-4-2010 10:02 PM | 显示全部楼层
我猜你可能是CLP学生。读一读你的课本,就会找到答案啦。
回复

使用道具 举报

发表于 2-4-2010 10:17 PM | 显示全部楼层
我猜你可能是CLP学生。读一读你的课本,就会找到答案啦。
回复

使用道具 举报

 楼主| 发表于 25-6-2010 08:59 PM | 显示全部楼层
谢谢指教。
回复

使用道具 举报

Follow Us
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT


版权所有 © 1996-2023 Cari Internet Sdn Bhd (483575-W)|IPSERVERONE 提供云主机|广告刊登|关于我们|私隐权|免控|投诉|联络|脸书|佳礼资讯网

GMT+8, 10-1-2025 04:57 PM , Processed in 0.176586 second(s), 24 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.4

Copyright © 2001-2021, Tencent Cloud.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表