|
|
楼主 |
发表于 12-1-2005 08:26 PM
|
显示全部楼层
大B 于 12-1-2005 06:15 PM 说 :
不错，用的是BAE的系统。
对了~ 什么是BAE系统？我不懂~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 12-1-2005 09:15 PM
|
显示全部楼层
steven268h 于 12-1-2005 08:26 PM 说 :
对了~ 什么是BAE系统？我不懂~
BAE－British aerospace engineering,
英国航太公司 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 12-1-2005 09:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
pfg1group 于 12-1-2005 09:15 PM 说 :
BAE－British aerospace engineering,
英国航太公司
呵呵呵` 谢谢你了~ 了解~ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 13-1-2005 10:44 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
UAV现阶段只是用来当作地面侦察或空中支援而已，如果要当做预警机的话还言之过早吧。。。毕竟要将这么多的雷达设备和感应器挤在UAV这么小的空间里现在还没什么可能吧，因为除了当作空中雷达之外，预警机还要当做空中指挥部，指挥战机作战，这点在选择预警机时也是个很重要的因素 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 13-1-2005 03:33 PM
|
显示全部楼层
steven268h 于 12-1-2005 20:26 说 :
对了~ 什么是BAE系统？我不懂~
BAE Systems，前身为British Aerospace (BAe)。BAE Systems业务横跨军民工，从天上到地面海面，再到水底。是典型的全方位工业集团。
这家公司和70年代出现过的一家小公司British Aerospace Engineering没有关系。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 13-1-2005 03:38 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Craven83 于 13-1-2005 10:44 说 :
UAV现阶段只是用来当作地面侦察或空中支援而已，如果要当做预警机的话还言之过早吧。。。毕竟要将这么多的雷达设备和感应器挤在UAV这么小的空间里现在还没什么可能吧，因为除了当作空中雷达之外，预警机还要当做空 ...
UAV现阶段作为预警用途是言之过早，因为还没有好处，绝对不是因为机体小，仪器塞不进。机体小可以弄大的，或用现在的机体（737， 767等等），把他们自动化好了，这也是unmanned aerial vehicle。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 19-2-2005 12:37 PM
|
显示全部楼层
我认为买巴西的EMB-145会比较好.
以我们马来西亚的国防开支来说的话,
我认为巴西的EMB-145预警机会有比较好的价格性能比. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-5-2005 10:39 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
問題是，有了早期警戒機，沒有資料鍊的話，用什麼來管制戰機呢，用語音通訊嗎？？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 9-5-2005 10:42 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
美國的 X－45 UCAV 應該是世界上第一架能戰鬥的 UAV 吧，無法想像未來的戰爭真的是機械人作戰的情景 ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 12-5-2005 09:59 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
X－45 UCAV空战应该还不行吧，普通的轰炸任务的话应该没问题 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-10-2005 09:57 AM
|
显示全部楼层
E2C预警机不只是可以预警而已，
还可以空中管制甚至是具有联合作战指挥功能。
假如你在地面上的指挥站被摧毁了，
就只有E2C可以作协调咯。
这也是它要那么多人的原因。
其实多一个指挥站多份保障嘛，
这个可以考虑考虑，
其它的我就不欲置评了。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
楼主 |
发表于 11-10-2005 12:01 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 sats 于 11-10-2005 09:57 AM 发表
E2C预警机不只是可以预警而已，
还可以空中管制甚至是具有联合作战指挥功能。
假如你在地面上的指挥站被摧毁了，
就只有E2C可以作协调咯。
这也是它要那么多人的原因。
其实多一个指挥站多份保障嘛 ...
目前我国考虑着的（实际上是已经决定购买了~ 那种款式现时不公布~ 等着国会批钱而已~）有3款预警机~ E2C~ EMB145还有一个是？型号（忘了）
[ 本帖最后由 steven268h 于 11-10-2005 12:05 PM 编辑 ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-10-2005 01:34 PM
|
显示全部楼层
原帖由 太空豬 于 9-5-2005 10:42 PM 发表
美國的 X－45 UCAV 應該是世界上第一架能戰鬥的 UAV 吧，無法想像未來的戰爭真的是機械人作戰的情景 ...
Predator早就上战场了，何时轮到X-45来当第一？ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-10-2005 03:47 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
X-45是第一架以战斗为前提而设计的UAV，PREDATOR原本只是侦察用，最后改良成为战斗用而已 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 11-10-2005 05:53 PM
|
显示全部楼层
Global Hawk是侦查版
Predator是战斗版
“美國的 X－45 UCAV 應該是世界上第一架能戰鬥的 UAV 吧？”
答案是错！ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 12-10-2005 01:29 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 15-4-2006 11:06 PM
|
显示全部楼层
刚刚看到JANES有这么一段新闻, 关于AWACS, 有提到马来西亚也在选购中.
Executive Overview: Jane's Radar and Electronic Warfare Systems
By Martin Streetly, JREW Editor
As this edition of Jane's Radar and Electronic Warfare Systems went to press, the global Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW&C) market was effectively dominated by four architectures: Ericsson Microwave's Erieye surveillance radar mounted on either an Embraer ERJ-145 or Saab 340/2000 airframe; Lockheed Martin's AN/APS-145 radar installed (predominantly) aboard Northrop Grumman's Hawkeye platform; Northrop Grumman's Multirole Electronically Scanned Array (MESA) sensor mounted on a Boeing 737 airframe; and Elta System's Phalcon AEW&C suite installed aboard either a Beriev A-50/Ilyushin Il-76 or Gulfstream G500 series airframe.
Of these, Erieye-based systems are in service with the air forces of Brazil, Greece, Mexico and Sweden and are being bid to South Korea and Pakistan (Saab 2000 aircraft), while Northrop Grumman continues to produce E-2C Hawkeye 2000 aircraft for the US Navy and is gearing up to produce the next generation E-2D platform which features a new ESA/mechanical scanning radar that is being developed by Lockheed Martin.
For its part, the Boeing 737/MESA combination has been ordered by Australia and Turkey and is a strong contender to meet South Korea's long standing E-X AEW & C requirement. Variants of Elta's Phalcon suite are mandated for an Indian Il-76 application and Israel's Gulfstream G500 series compact AEW platform, with the latter application forming the basis of a South Korean E-X bid.
While these four architectures are currently pre-eminent, readers should also note that India has restarted its indigenous AEW&C programme and is developing an indigenous ESA radar which, in the first instance, will be applied to an ERJ-145 platform.
Elsewhere, China has embarked on a two-pronged national AEW & C effort that centres around AEW&C variants of the Y-8 and Il-76 transport aircraft. Here, the Y-8 application makes use of what is believed to be an AESA radar that features a 'plank' antenna not dissimilar to that used with the Erieye sensor, while the Il-76 platform is equipped with a fixed, dorsal 'rotodome' that is suggestive of an ESA/AESA radar that makes use of three fixed transceiver arrays arranged in a triangular configuration to provide 360º coverage in azimuth.
Looking to the future, it is JREW’s opinion that the AEW & C market remains buoyant, with (alongside the already noted examples) procurements possible in Chile, Italy, Kuwait, Malaysia, Singapore (as a possible UAV solution - JREW believes such a capability will be demonstrated within the next decade), Spain, Thailand and the United Arab Emirates.
Readers should also remember the potential of helicopters in the AEW&C role, a viewpoint exemplified by India's procurement of the Ka-31/E-801 radar combination and the UK's use of the Sea King/Searchwater 2000AEW system.
433 of 4,598 words |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 15-4-2006 11:32 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-4-2006 11:05 PM
|
显示全部楼层
|
我选巴西 EMB-145，我认为它的价格性能比最好的。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 12-8-2006 12:11 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
个人觉得如果用boeing737作为飞机平台会比较好,至少737在我国有很多的维修人才. 但是一价737飞机好像不便宜..你们认为呢? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
 本周最热论坛帖子
|
3590 
112
