|
发表于 16-6-2017 08:11 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 16-6-2017 09:19 AM 编辑
这份附件很重要,LAST_WILL-LKY-Draft of 19 August 2011.DOC。我们是无法看到的,但法庭律师应该可以检验。:
(文件名字很怪,第七份遗嘱却以第一份遗嘱为蓝本?)
“Dear Pa Pa
This was the original agreed Will which ensures that all 3 children receive equal shares, taking into account the relative valuations (as at the date of demise) of the properties each receives.
Kim Li
Grateful if you could please engross.”
LSF appeared to have attached a file named <LAST_WILL-LKY-Draft of 19 August 2011.DOC> to that email.
Read more at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/n ... on-lee-kuan-8949800
补充:阿芬在2012年9月(第六份遗嘱前?)就想重提第一份遗嘱? 为何当时不成功? (据说第六份遗嘱没有拆房子的段落)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 08:25 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 08:44 AM
|
显示全部楼层
早就知道了, 不然晚年不会变成鬼模样
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 09:00 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 09:04 AM
|
显示全部楼层
她只是挂名顾问,重来没上过班,就整天在家里,虽然她说在照顾父母,但是李显龙都有为家里请专业看护。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 09:13 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 09:21 AM
|
显示全部楼层
今天又有episode 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 09:28 AM
|
显示全部楼层
在立遗嘱那边的时候,就只有弟妹两人在那边搞风搞雨,哥哥都没干涉。
老李去世后不久哥哥转态了真的很奇怪,会不会是律师发表遗嘱后发现弟妹什么东西了? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 09:47 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 16-6-2017 09:49 AM 编辑
我个人会倾向于拆屋分钱大家好聚好散的选择,但小李似乎不是这么想的。 (换我是小李,我会拆屋分钱作慈善,至于阿扬阿玲要不要作慈善,是他们的事。)
他有他的想法。
跟据小李的说法:
第一份到第四份遗嘱,有拆屋的段落。
第五份和第六份遗嘱,没有拆屋的段落。这中间应该是有很多争执,可怜的老李。。。
第七份遗嘱,律师换人,小李不在(他似乎到老李去世后才知道拆屋段落又出现,当时就有争执。)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:03 AM
|
显示全部楼层
根据遗嘱, Oxley老家本来是LHL的。 但是, LHL在2015年把老宅以市价卖给弟弟。同时规定弟弟需要捐一笔钱给慈善团体。所以现在老宅是完全属于弟弟的。
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:11 AM
|
显示全部楼层
我支持小扬和美美的~~
因为我看过李光耀的访问, 他自己提过要拆掉! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:18 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:20 AM
|
显示全部楼层
捐给慈善机构有问题吗!?你们“李家”都是有钱人了!何必为了房子翻脸!?捐出去也是显得“李家”大方得体和慈爱表现嘛。。。对于以后子孙或者事业发展都会有一定的好处不是吗?! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:23 AM
|
显示全部楼层
哪是他们当时认为是家事,不是现在
阁下的英文水准
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:28 AM
|
显示全部楼层
本帖最后由 kcchiew 于 16-6-2017 10:37 AM 编辑
捐款部份,报章有登过:
http://www.straitstimes.com/poli ... -to-eight-charities
小李也有提到房子全是阿扬的:
6. After the General Elections, LWL and LHY agreed to my fresh proposal to transfer 38 Oxley Road to LHY at market value, on condition that LHY and I each donated an amount equivalent to half of that value to charity, to pre-empt any future controversy over compensation or redevelopment proceeds. I was prepared to transfer 38 Oxley Road to LHY so that he and LWL could handle the 38 Oxley Road matter as they saw fit between them. In accordance with our agreement, I donated half of the value of 38 Oxley Road to charity. Although not required under the agreement, I also donated a sum equivalent to the other half of the value of 38 Oxley Road to charity. 38 Oxley Road now wholly belongs to LHY. This is consistent with the position that I had always held and conveyed to my family: that it is not tenable for the family to retain proceeds from any dealing with 38 Oxley Road, as it would look like the family is opposing acquisition and preservation of the House for monetary reasons. LHY was and continues to be unhappy about my taking this position. So, it would appear, is LWL.
Read more at http://www.channelnewsasia.com/n ... on-lee-kuan-8949800
阿玲的脸书也有提到阿扬被逼要捐钱。
https://www.facebook.com/weiling.lee.980
38 Oxley Road was bought by my parents, it is for them to decide what its fate is. My Father had told us, his children, repeatedly, that being family property, there is no need to donate to charity if Oxley were sold. Hsien Loong, as a condition for selling the house to Hsien Yang, and in his attempt to punish Hsien Yang for blocking what he wants to do with the house, stipulated that in addition to paying Hsien Loong the market value of the house, he must also donate 50% of that value to charity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:36 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:37 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:37 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:38 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
发表于 16-6-2017 10:41 AM
|
显示全部楼层
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
本周最热论坛帖子
|